Neuro-Therapy Clinic Inc, Denver, CO.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:639-48. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S24375. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
There has been a rapid increase in the use of polypharmacy in psychiatry possibly due to the introduction of newer drugs, greater availability of these newer drugs, excessive confidence in clinical trial results, widespread prescribing of psychotropic medications by primary care, and pressure to augment with additional medications for unresolved side effects or greater efficacy. Even the new generation of medications may not hold significant advantages over older drugs. In fact, there may be additional safety risks with polypharmacy being so widespread. Washout, as a clinical tool, is rarely done in medication management today. Studies have shown that augmenting therapy with additional medications resulted in 9.1%-34.1% dropouts due to intolerance of the augmentation, whereas studies of medication washout demonstrated only 5.9%-7.8% intolerance to the washout procedure. These perils justify reconsideration of medication washout before deciding on augmentation. There are unwarranted fears and resistance in the medical community toward medication washout, especially at the moment a physician is trying to decide whether to washout or add more medications to the treatment regimen. However, medication washout provides unique benefits to the physician: it establishes a new baseline of the disorder, helps identify medication efficacy from their adverse effects, and provides clarity of diagnosis and potential reduction of drug treatments, drug interactions, and costs. It may also reduce overall adverse events, not to mention a potential to reduce liability. After washout, physicians may be able to select the appropriate polypharmacy more effectively and safely, if necessary. Washout, while not for every patient, may be an effective tool for physicians who need to decide on whether to add potentially risky polypharmacy for a given patient. The risks of washout may, in some cases, be lower and the benefits may be clearly helpful for diagnosis, understanding medication effects, the doctor/patient relationship, and safer use of polypharmacy if indicated.
精神科中多药治疗的应用迅速增加,可能是由于新药的引入、这些新药的可用性增加、对临床试验结果的过度信任、初级保健中精神药物的广泛处方以及为解决不良反应或提高疗效而增加额外药物的压力。即使是新一代药物也不一定比旧药物有显著优势。事实上,多药治疗如此广泛可能会带来额外的安全风险。在当今的药物管理中,很少使用冲洗作为临床工具。研究表明,由于不能耐受增效剂,用额外药物增效治疗会导致 9.1%-34.1%的患者脱落,而药物冲洗研究表明,只有 5.9%-7.8%的患者对冲洗过程不耐受。这些危险情况使得在决定增效之前需要重新考虑药物冲洗。医疗界对药物冲洗存在不必要的恐惧和抵制,尤其是在医生试图决定是否冲洗或向治疗方案中添加更多药物时。然而,药物冲洗为医生提供了独特的好处:它确立了疾病的新基线,有助于从不良反应中确定药物的疗效,并提供明确的诊断和潜在的减少药物治疗、药物相互作用和成本。它还可能减少总体不良事件,更不用说减少潜在的责任。冲洗后,医生如果需要为特定患者决定是否添加潜在风险的多药治疗,可能能够更有效地和安全地选择适当的多药治疗。虽然不是每个患者都需要冲洗,但对于需要决定是否为特定患者添加潜在风险的多药治疗的医生来说,冲洗可能是一种有效的工具。在某些情况下,冲洗的风险可能较低,而冲洗对于诊断、了解药物作用、医患关系以及在需要时更安全地使用多药治疗可能会有明显的帮助。