Suppr超能文献

收入不平等与生育率:比较视角。

Income inequality and fertility: A comparative view.

出版信息

Popul Stud (Camb). 1975 Mar;29(1):5-19. doi: 10.1080/00324728.1975.10410181.

Abstract

Summary Most studies pertaining to the relationship between population and economic development suffer from a major flaw. Researchers use aggregate measures like income or energy consumption per head as indicators of economic development. Such aggregate measures fail to take into account the nature of the distribution of income or energy consumption to the population. The present study attempts to demonstrate the importance of incorporating the nature of distribution of resources as an important intervening variable in the study of the overall relationship between population and economic development. A measure of income inequality is developed which represents the difference between rural and urban incomes. This measure is justified in terms of the distinctiveness of urban and rural sectors in the process of development. The data used relate to societal measures of fertility, income, income inequality, etc. Consistently with existing literature, we observe that, generally speaking, economic development does entail a reduction in rural-urban income inequalities. On the other hand, a substantial part of the negative effect of an increase in income per head can be nullified if such an increase were not also accompanied by a reduction in rural-urban income inequality. Also, a substantial part of the negative effect of an increase in income per head and the level of education in reducing the level of infant mortality would be nullified if it did not also result in a reduction of rural-urban income inequality. On the other hand, it is quite possible for the level of education in a society to increase together with an increase in income per head without substantially altering the extent of inequality of income between the rural and the urban population. It is suggested that the positive relationship between rural-urban income inequality and the level of fertility is due to higher rural fertility rates in a high-inequality country. By implication, this would mean that higher standards of living for the rural population compared with its urban counterpart will have a favourable impact in reducing rural fertility.

摘要

总结 大多数关于人口与经济发展关系的研究都存在一个主要缺陷。研究人员使用人均收入或人均能源消耗等综合指标作为经济发展的指标。这些综合指标没有考虑到收入或能源消耗在人口中的分配性质。本研究试图证明将资源分配的性质作为人口与经济发展总体关系研究中的一个重要干预变量纳入研究的重要性。提出了一种衡量收入不平等的方法,该方法代表了城乡收入之间的差异。这一衡量方法是基于城乡部门在发展过程中的独特性来证明其合理性的。所使用的数据涉及社会生育、收入、收入不平等等等方面的衡量指标。与现有文献一致,我们观察到,一般来说,经济发展确实会减少城乡收入不平等。另一方面,如果人均收入的增加不是伴随着城乡收入不平等的减少,那么人均收入增加的负面影响的很大一部分就可以消除。同样,如果人均收入和教育水平的增加不能减少城乡收入不平等,那么它们在降低婴儿死亡率方面的负面影响的很大一部分也可以消除。另一方面,如果社会的教育水平随着人均收入的增加而提高,而没有实质性地改变城乡人口之间收入不平等的程度,这也是完全可能的。有人认为,城乡收入不平等与生育率之间的正相关关系是由于高收入不平等国家农村生育率较高所致。这意味着,与城市居民相比,农村居民生活水平的提高将对降低农村生育率产生有利影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验