奥马哈系统在体现公共卫生护士管理者干预措施方面的可行性。
Feasibility of using the Omaha System to represent public health nurse manager interventions.
机构信息
School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
出版信息
Public Health Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;28(5):421-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00926.x. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
OBJECTIVE
To test the feasibility of representing public health nurse (PHN) manager interventions using a recognized standardized nursing terminology.
DESIGN AND SAMPLE
A nurse manager in a Midwest local public health agency documented nurse manager interventions using the Omaha System for 5 months. ANALYTIC STRATEGY: The data were analyzed and the results were compared with the results from a parallel analysis of existing PHN intervention data.
RESULTS
Interventions for 79 "clients" (projects, teams, or individuals) captured 76% of recorded work hours, and addressed 43% of Omaha System problems. Most problems were addressed at the "community" level (87.1%) versus the "individual" level (12.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
Nursing practice differed between the 2 knowledge domains of public health family home visiting nursing and public health nursing management. Standardized nursing terminologies have the potential to represent, describe, and quantify nurse manager interventions for future evaluation and research.
目的
测试使用公认的标准化护理术语来表示公共卫生护士（PHN）经理干预措施的可行性。
设计与样本
中西部地区地方公共卫生机构的一名护士经理使用奥马哈系统（Omaha System）记录了 5 个月的护士经理干预措施。
分析策略
对数据进行了分析，结果与现有 PHN 干预数据的平行分析结果进行了比较。
结果
针对 79 个“客户”（项目、团队或个人）的干预措施占记录工作时间的 76%，并解决了 43%的奥马哈系统问题。大多数问题是在“社区”层面（87.1%）而不是“个人”层面（12.9%）解决的。
结论
公共卫生家庭探访护理和公共卫生护理管理这两个知识领域的护理实践存在差异。标准化护理术语有可能代表、描述和量化未来评估和研究的护士经理干预措施。
Zotero 插件