Private Practice, Barcelona/Madrid, Spain.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Mar;24(3):305-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02317.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
The purpose of this animal study was to radiologically measure the influence of abutment disconnection on bone resorption and to compare this influence on platform-switched vs. non-platform-switched implants.
The study design included extraction of all mandibular premolars in five canines . After 2 months, six implants were placed in each dog. Four of them were platform-switched (PS) implants and two were non-platform-switched (NPS) implants. Some or all of the abutments connected to the implants were disconnected at pre-ordained post-surgical intervals. Radiographs were taken at the time of implant placement and at every handling. The values for mesial (horizontal and vertical) and distal (horizontal and vertical) bone resorption were taken and compared for each implant at every abutment dis/reconnection.
The average vertical bone resorption around NPS implants after four dis/reconnections was 1.09 mm (SD 0.25 mm), and the average horizontal bone resorption was 0.98 mm (SD 0.27 mm). The average vertical bone resorption around PS implants after four dis/reconnections was 0.24 mm, (SD 0.08 mm) and the average horizontal bone resorption was 0.24 mm (SD 0.13 mm). The difference of the average horizontal and vertical bone resorption around NPS (site D) and PS (site A) implants was statically significant (P < 0.05). The average mesial and distal bone resorption values around PS (site A) implant adjacent to a tooth were compared, and statically significant differences were found (P < 0.05).
Implants with a PS design show less peri-implant bone resorption during the healing process and as their abutments are disconnected, than do comparably dis/reconnected NPS implants. The location of the PS implant next to a tooth may decrease radiographically visible peri-implant bone resorption significantly.
本动物研究旨在通过影像学测量基台连接断开对骨吸收的影响,并比较平台转换型与非平台转换型种植体的影响。
该研究设计包括在五颗犬齿中拔除所有下颌前磨牙。两个月后,每只狗植入六颗种植体。其中四颗为平台转换型(PS)种植体,另外两颗为非平台转换型(NPS)种植体。在预定的术后间隔时间,部分或全部连接到种植体的基台被断开。在种植体植入时和每次处理时拍摄 X 光片。测量每个种植体在每次连接/断开基台时的近中(水平和垂直)和远中(水平和垂直)骨吸收值,并进行比较。
在经历四次连接/断开后,NPS 种植体周围的平均垂直骨吸收量为 1.09 毫米(标准差 0.25 毫米),平均水平骨吸收量为 0.98 毫米(标准差 0.27 毫米)。在经历四次连接/断开后,PS 种植体周围的平均垂直骨吸收量为 0.24 毫米(标准差 0.08 毫米),平均水平骨吸收量为 0.24 毫米(标准差 0.13 毫米)。NPS(部位 D)和 PS(部位 A)种植体周围的平均水平和垂直骨吸收差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PS(部位 A)种植体相邻牙齿的近中和远中骨吸收值进行比较,发现具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
在愈合过程中,与可比的连接/断开的 NPS 种植体相比,具有 PS 设计的种植体显示出较少的种植体周围骨吸收,而当基台断开时,其骨吸收量也较少。PS 种植体紧邻牙齿的位置可能会显著减少影像学上可见的种植体周围骨吸收。