Wolak Talya, Belkin Ana, Ginsburg Victor, Greenberg George, Mayzler Olga, Bolotin Arkady, Paran Esther, Szendro Gabriel
Hypertension Clinic, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2011 Oct;13(10):619-24.
Percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) and stenting is an established procedure for the treatment of hypertension caused by atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. However recently, the decision whether or notto perform this procedure has raised considerable debate.
To examine the association between the basic clinical and radiological characteristics of candidates for renal artery PTA and the clinical outcome of the procedure in terms of improvement of blood pressure control and renal function.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty (PTRA) and stent implantation in a tertiary medical center during the period 2000-2007. The clinical and radiological data were extracted from the medical file of each patient. Blood pressure measurements and creatinine level were recorded before the procedure and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after PTRA.
Thirty-two patients were included in the final statistical analysis. The mean age of the study population was 66.6 +/- 8.8 years old and 75% were men. There was a significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure 1 month after the procedure: 160.5 +/- 24.7 vs. 141.8 +/- 23.6 mmHg and 83.8 +/- 12.9 vs. 68.8 +/- 11.8 mmHg respectively (P < 0.001). The reduction in blood pressure was constant throughout the follow-up period and was evident 18 months after the procedure: 160.5 +/- 24.7 vs. 135.0 +/- 35.1 mmHg and 83.8 +/- 12.9 vs. 71.3 +/- 16.5 mmHg respectively (P < 0.001). However, no improvement in renal function was observed at any time during the follow-up period. We could not demonstrate an association between clinical or radiological features and the clinical outcome after PTRA.
Our findings show that PTRA can be considered an effective procedure for improving blood pressure control in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and resistant hypertension. This research, together with previous studies, strengthens the knowledge that the decline in glomerular filtration rate seen in many patients with ARAS is non-reversible and is not improved by PTRA.
经皮血管成形术(PTA)和支架置入术是治疗动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄所致高血压的既定方法。然而,最近对于是否实施该手术的决策引发了大量争论。
根据血压控制改善情况和肾功能,研究肾动脉PTA候选者的基本临床和放射学特征与手术临床结局之间的关联。
我们对2000年至2007年期间在一家三级医疗中心接受经皮腔内肾动脉血管成形术(PTRA)和支架植入术的所有患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。临床和放射学数据从每位患者的病历中提取。在手术前以及PTRA后1个月、6个月、12个月和18个月记录血压测量值和肌酐水平。
32例患者纳入最终统计分析。研究人群的平均年龄为66.6±8.8岁,75%为男性。术后1个月收缩压和舒张压均显著降低:分别为160.5±24.7 mmHg对141.8±23.6 mmHg以及83.8±12.9 mmHg对68.8±11.8 mmHg(P<0.001)。在整个随访期间血压持续降低,术后18个月时仍很明显:分别为160.5±24.7 mmHg对135.0±35.1 mmHg以及83.8±12.9 mmHg对71.3±16.5 mmHg(P<0.001)。然而,在随访期间任何时间均未观察到肾功能改善。我们未能证明临床或放射学特征与PTRA后的临床结局之间存在关联。
我们的研究结果表明,PTRA可被视为改善动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄(ARAS)和顽固性高血压患者血压控制的有效方法。这项研究与先前的研究共同强化了以下认识:许多ARAS患者中观察到的肾小球滤过率下降是不可逆的,且PTRA无法改善。