Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Breast J. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):3-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01180.x. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
We report the utility of office-based, nonimaged guided fine needle aspiration of palpable axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. We examine the sensitivity and specificity of this procedure, and examine factors associated with a positive fine needle aspiration biopsy result. Although the utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) of axillary lymph nodes is well established, there is little data on nonimage guided office-based FNA of palpable axillary lymphadenopathy. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of nonimage-guided FNA of axillary lymphadenopathy in patients presenting with breast cancer, and report factors associated with a positive FNA result. Retrospective study of 94 patients who underwent office-based FNA of palpable axillary lymph nodes between 2004 and 2008 was conducted. Cytology results were compared with pathology after axillary sentinel node or lymph node dissection. Nonimage-guided axillary FNA was 86% sensitive and 100% specific. On univariate analysis, patients with positive FNA cytology had larger breast tumors (p = 0.007), more pathologic positive lymph nodes (p < 0.0001), and were more likely to present with a palpable breast mass (p = 0.006) or with radiographic lymphadenopathy (p = 0.002). FNA-positive patients had an increased presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001), higher stage of disease (p < 0.001), higher N stage (p < 0.0001), and higher rate of HER2/neu expression (p = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, radiographic lymphadenopathy (p = 0.03) and number of positive lymph nodes (p = 0.04) were associated with a positive FNA result. Nonimage-guided FNA of palpable axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients is an inexpensive, sensitive, and specific test. Prompt determination of lymph node positivity benefits select patients, permitting avoidance of axillary ultrasound, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or delay in receiving neoadjuvant therapy. This results in time and cost savings for the health care system, and expedites definitive management.
我们报告了在乳腺癌患者中进行基于办公室的、无成像引导的细针抽吸术对可触及腋窝淋巴结的应用。我们检查了该程序的敏感性和特异性,并研究了与阳性细针抽吸活检结果相关的因素。虽然超声引导下的腋窝淋巴结细针抽吸活检(FNA)的应用已得到充分证实,但关于无成像引导的基于办公室的可触及腋窝淋巴结病的 FNA 数据很少。我们研究了在患有乳腺癌的患者中进行无成像引导的基于办公室的腋窝淋巴结 FNA 的敏感性和特异性,并报告了与阳性 FNA 结果相关的因素。对 2004 年至 2008 年间进行的基于办公室的可触及腋窝淋巴结 FNA 的 94 例患者进行了回顾性研究。细胞学结果与腋窝前哨淋巴结或淋巴结清扫后的病理结果进行了比较。无成像引导的腋窝 FNA 的敏感性为 86%,特异性为 100%。在单因素分析中,细胞学阳性 FNA 的患者具有更大的乳腺肿瘤(p=0.007)、更多的病理阳性淋巴结(p<0.0001),并且更有可能出现可触及的乳腺肿块(p=0.006)或影像学上的淋巴结病(p=0.002)。FNA 阳性患者的淋巴管侵犯存在增加(p=0.001)、疾病分期更高(p<0.001)、N 分期更高(p<0.0001)和 HER2/neu 表达率更高(p=0.008)。在多因素分析中,影像学上的淋巴结病(p=0.03)和阳性淋巴结的数量(p=0.04)与阳性 FNA 结果相关。在乳腺癌患者中,无成像引导的可触及腋窝淋巴结 FNA 是一种廉价、敏感且特异性的检查。快速确定淋巴结阳性有助于选择患者,避免进行腋窝超声、前哨淋巴结活检或延迟接受新辅助治疗。这为医疗保健系统节省了时间和成本,并加快了明确的管理。