Ansari M A, Sharma V P, Razdan R K, Mittal P K
Malaria Research Centre, Delhi, India.
Indian J Malariol. 1990 Jun;27(2):57-64.
A study was carried out in certain villages of Distt. Ghaziabad (U.P.) to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available mosquito repellent preparations and devices. Results revealed that none of the repellents tested provided absolute protection against mosquito bites. The protection varied from 38 to 98% with different species of mosquitoes. In general, better protection was provided against Anopheles bite than against Culex. Of ten repellents evaluated. Mylol oil and Tortoise coils were marginally superior to Odomos cream and Rooster coils. Among electrical devices, Good Bye and Casper were marginally superior to Good Knight and Knight Queen.
在北方邦加济阿巴德县的某些村庄开展了一项研究，以评估市售驱蚊制剂和设备的功效。结果显示，所测试的驱蚊剂均未提供针对蚊虫叮咬的绝对防护。针对不同种类的蚊子，防护效果从38%至98%不等。总体而言，针对按蚊叮咬的防护效果优于库蚊。在所评估的10种驱蚊剂中，米洛油和蚊香略优于奥多摩斯乳膏和雄鸡蚊香。在电子设备中，拜拜牌和卡斯帕牌略优于好骑士牌和骑士女王牌。
