Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University & Virginia Polytechnic Institute Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3611-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.099. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
Previous PET and fMRI brain imaging studies targeting neural networks processing itch sensation have used histamine as the sole itch inducer. In contrast with histamine, cowhage-induced itch is mediated via proteinase activated receptors PAR2 and is transmitted through a separate spinothalamic pathway, therefore imaging the brain activation evoked by cowhage could provide further insight into central processing of itch. We report for the first time a functional MRI Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) study of neuronal processing of itch induced by cowhage, analyzed in contrast with histamine-induced itch. We also explored the brain responses induced by histamine and cowhage combined in a tight sequence. The results of our analyses obtained in a group of 15 healthy volunteers suggested that cowhage and histamine co-activated a core group of brain structures, while also revealing notable differences. Core areas activated by both stimuli were found in the thalamus, primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, posterior parietal cortex, superior and middle temporal cortices, PCC, ACC, precuneus and cuneus. Cowhage induced a notably distinct and more extensive involvement of the insular cortex, claustrum, basal ganglia, putamen, thalamic nuclei and pulvinar. The differences observed between these two itch modalities were investigated to determine the impact of quantitative versus qualitative factors, and correlations between itch intensity and the patterns in brain activation were explored. Our analysis revealed that the most significant differences between cowhage and histamine itch were not affected by stimulus intensity, although a subset of regions displayed activations which were intensity-dependent. The combined application of cowhage and histamine highlighted the role of insula and claustrum in the processing of both itch modalities in the same time. The present results suggest the existence of overlapping but also distinct neuronal networks processing these two different types of itch.
先前针对瘙痒感觉处理神经网络的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)脑成像研究均使用组胺作为唯一的瘙痒诱导剂。与组胺不同,苍耳子引起的瘙痒是通过蛋白酶激活受体 PAR2 介导的,并通过单独的脊髓丘脑途径传递,因此,对苍耳子引起的脑激活进行成像可以进一步深入了解瘙痒的中枢处理。我们首次报告了一项使用动脉自旋标记(ASL)的功能性磁共振成像研究,用于分析苍耳子诱导的瘙痒的神经元处理,与组胺诱导的瘙痒进行对比。我们还探索了在紧密序列中组胺和苍耳子共同诱导的脑反应。我们在一组 15 名健康志愿者中进行的分析结果表明,苍耳子和组胺共同激活了一组核心脑结构,同时也揭示了明显的差异。这两种刺激都激活的核心区域位于丘脑、初级和次级躯体感觉皮层、顶后皮质、中上颞叶皮质、后扣带回、前扣带皮质、楔前叶和楔叶。苍耳子引起的岛叶、屏状核、基底神经节、壳核、丘脑核和丘脑枕的参与明显不同且更为广泛。研究了这两种瘙痒模式之间的差异,以确定定量与定性因素的影响,并探索了瘙痒强度与大脑激活模式之间的相关性。我们的分析表明,苍耳子和组胺瘙痒之间最显著的差异不受刺激强度的影响,尽管一些区域的激活与强度有关。苍耳子和组胺的联合应用突出了岛叶和屏状核在同一时间处理这两种不同类型瘙痒中的作用。目前的结果表明,处理这两种不同类型瘙痒的神经元网络存在重叠但也有明显的区别。