Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jan;48(2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.10.021. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
The effect of zoledronic acid in breast cancer adjuvant therapy concerning improvement of patient survival has yet to be confirmed. We performed a meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised controlled trials with the aim of accurate evaluation between clinical outcome and the association of the addition of zoledronic acid to adjuvant therapy.
We searched PubMed (from 1966 to present) and online abstracts from the proceeding Annual Meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (years 1992-2010) and online abstracts from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (years 2004-2010). A total of five eligible studies including 3676 subjects and 3678 controls met our search criteria and were evaluated. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. The primary study end-points were the disease free survival (DFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), distant or loco-regional recurrence free survival and bone metastasis free survival.
Compared with the control arm, adjuvant breast cancer treatment with zoledronic acid did not significantly improve overall survival, disease free survival, bone metastasis free survival, distant and locoregional recurrence free survival. However, in the postmenopausal subgroup, the addition of zoledronic acid to standard therapy could significantly improve DFS (relative risk (RR) = 0.763, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.658-0.884, p < 0.001) and reduce the risk of distant (RR = 0.744, 95%CI 0.611-0.906, p = 0.003) and locoregional recurrence (RR = 0.508, 95%CI 0.340-0.760, p = 0.001).
Adjuvant zoledronic acid did not significantly improve the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Due to the highly variable definitions of menopause utilised in different studies, we hypothesise that zoledronic acid may have a potential effect on postmenopausal patients. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the value of adjuvant treatment of zoledronic acid in premenopausal counterparts, differing disease stages and various pathological types of breast cancer.
唑来膦酸在乳腺癌辅助治疗中改善患者生存的效果尚待证实。我们对已发表和未发表的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,旨在准确评估临床结果与辅助治疗中添加唑来膦酸的关联。
我们检索了 PubMed(从 1966 年至今)和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)年会在线摘要(1992-2010 年)以及圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会在线摘要(2004-2010 年)。共有 5 项符合检索标准的研究纳入分析,共纳入 3676 例患者和 3678 例对照。对符合条件的研究采用随机和固定效应荟萃分析模型,并评估了研究间的异质性。主要研究终点是无病生存(DFS)。次要终点是总生存(OS)、远处或局部区域无复发生存和骨转移无复发生存。
与对照组相比,乳腺癌辅助治疗中添加唑来膦酸并未显著改善总生存、无病生存、骨转移无复发生存、远处和局部区域无复发生存。然而,在绝经后亚组中,标准治疗中添加唑来膦酸可显著改善 DFS(相对危险度(RR)=0.763,95%置信区间(CI)0.658-0.884,p<0.001)和降低远处(RR=0.744,95%CI 0.611-0.906,p=0.003)和局部区域复发(RR=0.508,95%CI 0.340-0.760,p=0.001)的风险。
辅助唑来膦酸并未显著改善乳腺癌患者的预后。由于不同研究中绝经的定义差异较大,我们假设唑来膦酸可能对绝经后患者具有潜在作用。需要进一步研究评估绝经前患者、不同疾病阶段和不同病理类型乳腺癌辅助治疗中添加唑来膦酸的价值。