Suppr超能文献

“阴影征”:脊柱手术中不锈钢与钛制脊柱内固定器械的影像学鉴别

The "shadow sign": a radiographic differentiation of stainless steel versus titanium spinal instrumentation in spine surgery.

作者信息

Jones-Quaidoo Sean M, Novicoff Wendy, Park Andrew, Arlet Vincent

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Dec;31(8):875-7. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31822e024a.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stainless steel spinal instrumentation has been supplanted in recent years by titanium instrumentation. Knowing whether stainless steel or titanium was used in a previous surgery can guide clinical decision making processes, but frequently the clinician has no way to know what type of metal was used. We describe the radiographic "shadow sign," in which superimposed titanium rods and screws remain radiolucent enough that the contour of the underlying components can be seen on a lateral radiograph, whereas superimposed stainless steel rods and screws are completely radiopaque. This technique was evaluated using a retrospective, randomized, and blinded radiographic comparison of titanium and stainless steel spinal instrumentation. The objective was to determine whether the "shadow sign" can reliably differentiate titanium from stainless steel spinal instrumentation.

METHODS

Lateral radiographs from 16 cases of posterior spinal instrumentation (6 titanium, 6 stainless steel, and 2 replicates of each to assess intraobserver reliability) were randomly selected from a database of cases performed for pediatric scoliosis in a university setting from 2005 to 2009. The cases were randomized then shown to 19 orthopaedic surgery residents, 1 spine fellow, and 2 spine attendings. After the "shadow sign" was described, the surgeons were asked to determine what type of metal each implant was made of.

RESULTS

The κ value for both stainless steel and titanium versus the gold standard was 0.83 [standard error (SE) = 0.053], indicating excellent agreement. The κ value for agreement between raters was 0.71 (SE = 0.016) and the κ value for agreement within raters was 0.70 (SE = 0.016), both of which indicated substantial agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The "shadow sign" can help a clinician differentiate titanium from stainless steel spinal instrumentation based on radiographic appearance alone. Furthermore, our study reveals that the level of experience in diagnosing spinal lateral radiographs also enhances the use of the "shadow sign" indicator.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

The method proposed to differentiate titanium from stainless steel falls within the diagnostic studies domain. As unaltered randomization was used to enroll radiographs and the procedure was systematic, this study may be classified in the Level II category.

摘要

背景

近年来,钛制脊柱内固定器械已逐渐取代了不锈钢脊柱内固定器械。了解既往手术中使用的是不锈钢还是钛制器械有助于指导临床决策过程,但临床医生常常无法得知使用的是何种金属材质。我们描述了一种影像学上的“阴影征”,即叠加在一起的钛棒和钛钉在X线片上仍具有足够的透光性,以至于在侧位X线片上能够看到其下方器械的轮廓,而叠加在一起的不锈钢棒和不锈钢钉则完全不透光。本研究采用回顾性、随机且双盲的影像学方法对钛制和不锈钢制脊柱内固定器械进行比较,旨在确定“阴影征”能否可靠地区分钛制和不锈钢制脊柱内固定器械。

方法

从2005年至2009年在某大学进行的小儿脊柱侧弯病例数据库中随机选取16例后路脊柱内固定手术的侧位X线片(6例钛制器械、6例不锈钢制器械,每种各重复2例以评估观察者内部信度)。将这些病例随机分组后展示给19名骨科住院医师、1名脊柱专科医师和2名脊柱科主治医师。在介绍了“阴影征”之后,要求外科医生判断每个植入物是由何种金属制成的。

结果

不锈钢和钛制器械与金标准的κ值均为0.83[标准误(SE)=0.053],表明一致性极佳。评估者之间的一致性κ值为0.71(SE = 0.016),评估者内部的一致性κ值为0.70(SE = 0.016),两者均表明一致性较高。

结论

“阴影征”可帮助临床医生仅根据影像学表现区分钛制和不锈钢制脊柱内固定器械。此外,我们的研究表明,诊断脊柱侧位X线片的经验水平也有助于提高“阴影征”指标的应用效果。

证据级别

本研究中用于区分钛制和不锈钢制器械的方法属于诊断性研究范畴。由于采用了未改变的随机化方法纳入X线片且研究过程具有系统性,本研究可归类为II级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验