Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚的血管性血友病诊断与管理。

Diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease in Australia.

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2011 Jul;37(5):542-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281041. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

Abstract

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and arises from deficiencies and/or defects in the plasma protein Von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD is classified into six different types, with type 1 identifying a (partial) quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 defining a (virtual) total deficiency of VWF, and type 2 identifying four separate types (2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N) characterized by qualitative defects. The classification is based on phenotypic assays including factor VIII coagulant, VWF antigen, and VWF activity, primarily by ristocetin cofactor and collagen binding, as supplemented by additional testing. In Australia, >30 pathology-based laboratories perform VWD testing, and tests and test panels reflect a wide variety of practice. In our own referral laboratory, diagnosis is a staged process reflecting a combination of clinical and laboratory findings with a large panel of tests. We also use data from desmopressin trials to assist in VWD type assignment. The current report presents an overview of the VWD diagnostic process as applied within Australia, includes summary data from the Australian Bleeding Disorders Registry, and provides specific details of the diagnostic and management practice undertaken in our reference laboratory, which also maintains a local bleeding disorders database. This database currently contains 4070 entries, including 1832 suspected or confirmed cases of VWD. Excluding 311 as yet unclassified cases, 1254 cases (82.4%) would define (potential) quantitative deficiencies of VWF ("low VWF" or type 1 VWD), 241 (15.8%) qualitative defects (type 2 VWD), and 23 (1.5%) type 3 VWD. Most of the quantitative defects reflect only mild loss of VWF, and <15% of total cases would be identified to have VWF levels <35 U/dL. Most cases of type 2 remain unclassified (34.9%) because available data are limited. Type 2A and 2M VWD represent the most common qualitative defects, representing 22.8% and 22.2% of defined type 2 VWD cases. Type 2B and 2N reflect 8.3% and 12.9%, respectively, of type 2 VWD cases.

摘要

血管性血友病(VWD)是最常见的遗传性出血性疾病,由血浆蛋白血管性血友病因子(VWF)的缺乏和/或缺陷引起。VWD 分为六种不同类型,1 型为 VWF 的(部分)定量缺乏,3 型为 VWF 的(几乎)完全缺乏,2 型则分为四种不同类型(2A、2B、2M 和 2N),其特点为定性缺陷。该分类基于表型测定,包括因子 VIII 凝血活性、VWF 抗原和 VWF 活性,主要通过瑞斯托霉素辅因子和胶原结合进行,此外还辅以其他检测。在澳大利亚,有 30 多个基于病理学的实验室进行 VWD 检测,检测和检测组合反映了广泛的实践差异。在我们自己的参考实验室,诊断是一个分阶段的过程,反映了临床和实验室发现的结合,以及大量的检测组合。我们还利用去氨加压素试验的数据来协助 VWD 类型的分配。本报告概述了在澳大利亚应用的 VWD 诊断过程,包括澳大利亚出血性疾病登记处的汇总数据,并提供了我们参考实验室进行的诊断和管理实践的具体细节,该实验室还维护一个本地出血性疾病数据库。该数据库目前包含 4070 个条目,包括 1832 例疑似或确诊的 VWD 病例。排除 311 例尚未分类的病例后,1254 例(82.4%)为 VWF 的(潜在)定量缺乏(“低 VWF”或 1 型 VWD),241 例(15.8%)为定性缺陷(2 型 VWD),23 例(1.5%)为 3 型 VWD。大多数定量缺陷仅反映 VWF 的轻度缺失,<15%的总病例会被鉴定为 VWF 水平<35 U/dL。由于可用数据有限,大多数 2 型病例仍未分类(34.9%)。2A 和 2M VWD 是最常见的定性缺陷,占已定义的 2 型 VWD 病例的 22.8%和 22.2%。2B 和 2N 分别占 2 型 VWD 病例的 8.3%和 12.9%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验