Breumelhof R, Nadorp J H, Akkermans L M, Smout A J
Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gastroenterology. 1990 Nov;99(5):1257-64. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91147-x.
Fourty-four unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain were studied using conventional manometry with additional edrophonium provocation and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure recording with a system developed by our group. New, fully automated techniques of statistical analysis of the complete set of esophageal pressure and pH signals were used to examine the temporal relation between pain, esophageal motility disturbances, and gastroesophageal reflux. The analysis used the 97.5th percentile of amplitude and duration of all esophageal contractions in each patient as well as a chi 2 test of the distribution of contraction types to determine whether a pain episode was related to abnormal motility or not. The edrophonium test results were positive in 2 patients. Only 25 patients (56.8%) had at least one pain episode (total, 111 episodes) during 24-hour recording. Thirty-three percent of the pain episodes were related to reflux and 23.4% to abnormal motility, and 43.2% were not related to an esophageal function disturbance. In the patient-oriented analysis in this study, it was required for a positive correlation that the symptom index (percentage of related pain episodes) was higher than 75%. It was found that the pain was related to reflux in 2 patients (4.6%), to reflux and motor abnormalities in 4 (9.2%), and to motor abnormalities in 2 patients (4.6%). In 36 patients (81.8%), no relation with an esophageal abnormality could be established, either because the patients had no pain during the 24-hour study, or because the pain seemed unrelated to reflux or abnormal motility.
采用传统测压法并附加依酚氯铵激发试验,以及使用我们团队研发的系统进行24小时动态食管pH值和压力记录,对44例未经挑选的非心源性胸痛患者进行了研究。运用全新的全自动技术对整套食管压力和pH值信号进行统计分析,以检验疼痛、食管动力障碍和胃食管反流之间的时间关系。分析采用了每位患者所有食管收缩幅度和持续时间的第97.5百分位数,以及收缩类型分布的卡方检验,以确定疼痛发作是否与异常动力相关。依酚氯铵试验结果在2例患者中呈阳性。在24小时记录期间,仅有25例患者(56.8%)至少有一次疼痛发作(总计111次发作)。33%的疼痛发作与反流有关,23.4%与异常动力有关,43.2%与食管功能障碍无关。在本研究以患者为导向的分析中,若症状指数(相关疼痛发作的百分比)高于75%,则要求存在正相关。结果发现,2例患者(4.6%)的疼痛与反流有关,4例(9.2%)与反流和运动异常有关,2例患者(4.6%)与运动异常有关。在36例患者(81.8%)中,无法确定与食管异常有关,要么是因为患者在24小时研究期间无疼痛,要么是因为疼痛似乎与反流或异常动力无关。