Lemire S
Laval University, Quebec.
Can J Gastroenterol. 1997 Sep;11 Suppl B:37B-40B.
Heartburn, suggesting gastroesophageal reflux, is common. Epidemiological studies have shown that 36% to 44% of adults experience heartburn at least once a month, 14% weekly and 7% once a day. Heartburn and regurgitations are the typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). When present as predominant symptoms, they are quite specific but not very sensitive. Clinical severity of GERD does not predict the severity of the underlying condition. The diagnostic approach to patients with GERD depends on the clinical presentation and the question to be answered -Is abnormal reflux present? Is there mucosal injury? Are symptoms due to reflux? Several techniques such as barium swallow, endoscopy, ambulatory pH monitoring, esophageal manometry and 24 h pH/motility can be used to answer those questions. Barium swallow is not much help in diagnosing reflux esophagitis because reflux can occur in more than 25% of asymptomatic patients. It is most useful in demonstrating structural abnormalities such as strictures and hiatal hernia. The importance of hiatal hernia in the pathogenesis of GERD has been controversial. Recent studies suggest that GERD patients with hiatal hernia present with greater extent of reflux and more severe esophagitis. Endoscopy is the best diagnostic study for mucosal evaluation. Ambulatory 24 h pH monitoring is indicated for patients with atypical symptoms of reflux such as chest pain or pulmonary symptoms, or those who do no respond to therapy. The evaluation of duodenogastroesophageal reflux or alkaline reflux can be measured, but the clinical importance of this test remains controversial. Esophageal manometry allows measurement of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LES) and the evaluation of esophageal peristalsis. There is a lack of correlation between LES and reflux esophagitis. The role of peristaltic dysfunction in GERD is unclear, but the high percentage of abnormal contractions suggests a more severe form of GERD. Esophageal motility study can document the presence of effective esophageal peristalsis in patients before antireflux surgery. Twenty-four hour pH/motility is not yet available widely. It is useful in patients who have several daily attacks. There is a correlation with acid reflux in approximately 40% of events. Investigation of noncardiac angina-like chest pain is best achieved by standard esophageal manometry combined with provocative testing. Most laboratories performing these studies use acid perfusion and pharmacostimulation with either bethanechol or edrophonium to reproduce the patient's chest pain during esophageal manometry. Esophageal balloon distension is considered to give the highest yield as a provocative test in patients with angina-like chest pain. It is believed that abnormal esophageal nociception is not simply related to underlying motor dysfunction but also to the presence of a visceral sensory abnormality.
烧心提示胃食管反流,较为常见。流行病学研究表明,36%至44%的成年人每月至少经历一次烧心,14%每周经历一次,7%每天经历一次。烧心和反流是胃食管反流病(GERD)的典型症状。当作为主要症状出现时,它们相当具有特异性,但不太敏感。GERD的临床严重程度并不能预测潜在病情的严重程度。GERD患者的诊断方法取决于临床表现以及需要回答的问题——是否存在异常反流?是否有黏膜损伤?症状是否由反流引起?可以使用多种技术,如钡餐检查、内镜检查、动态pH监测、食管测压以及24小时pH/动力监测来回答这些问题。钡餐检查对诊断反流性食管炎帮助不大,因为超过25%的无症状患者会出现反流。它在显示诸如狭窄和食管裂孔疝等结构异常方面最为有用。食管裂孔疝在GERD发病机制中的重要性一直存在争议。最近的研究表明,患有食管裂孔疝的GERD患者反流程度更大,食管炎更严重。内镜检查是评估黏膜的最佳诊断方法。对于有反流非典型症状(如胸痛或肺部症状)的患者,或对治疗无反应的患者,建议进行动态24小时pH监测。可以测量十二指肠胃食管反流或碱性反流,但该检查的临床重要性仍存在争议。食管测压可测量食管下括约肌压力(LES)并评估食管蠕动。LES与反流性食管炎之间缺乏相关性。蠕动功能障碍在GERD中的作用尚不清楚,但异常收缩的高比例表明GERD的形式更为严重。食管动力研究可以记录抗反流手术前患者有效食管蠕动的存在情况。24小时pH/动力监测尚未广泛应用。它对每天发作数次的患者有用。在大约40%的事件中与酸反流相关。对于非心源性心绞痛样胸痛的调查,最好通过标准食管测压结合激发试验来完成。大多数进行这些研究的实验室使用酸灌注以及用氨甲酰甲胆碱或依酚氯铵进行药物刺激,以在食管测压期间重现患者的胸痛。对于心绞痛样胸痛患者,食管气囊扩张被认为是激发试验中阳性率最高的方法。人们认为,异常的食管伤害感受不仅与潜在的运动功能障碍有关,还与内脏感觉异常的存在有关。