• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结清扫数目是影响 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者生存的重要决定因素。

Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, 4-9-13 Yohnan, Utsunomiya, Tochigi-ken 320-0834, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan;42(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr164. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyr164
PMID:22102737
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The number of lymph nodes retrieved is recognized to be a prognostic factor of Stage II colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes retrieved in Stage III colorectal cancer remains controversial.

METHODS

The relationship between the number of lymph nodes retrieved and clinical and pathological factors, and significance of the number of lymph nodes retrieved for prognosis of Stage II and III colorectal cancer were investigated. A total of 16 865 patients with T3/T4 colorectal cancer who had R0 resection were analysed.

RESULTS

The arithmetic mean of the number of lymph nodes retrieved of all cases was 20.0. The number of lymph nodes retrieved were varied according to several clinical and pathological variables with significant difference, and the greater difference was observed in scope of nodal dissection. Survival of Stages II and III was significantly associated with the number of lymph nodes retrieved. Five-year overall survival of the patients with ≤ 9 of the number of lymph nodes retrieved and those with >27 differed by 6.4% for Stage II colon cancer, 8.8% for Stage III colon cancer, 12.5% for Stage II rectal cancer and 10.6% for Stage III rectal cancer. With one increase in the number of lymph nodes retrieved, the mortality risk was decreased by 2.1% for Stage II and by 0.8% for Stage III, respectively. The cut-off point of the number of lymph nodes retrieved was not obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of lymph nodes retrieved was shown to be an important prognostic variable not only in Stage II but also in Stage III colorectal cancer, and it was most prominently determined by the scope of nodal dissection. A cut-off value for the number of lymph nodes retrieved was not found, and it is necessary to carry out appropriate nodal dissection and examine as many lymph nodes as possible.

摘要

目的

淋巴结检出数目已被确认为结直肠癌Ⅱ期的预后因素。然而,在结直肠癌Ⅲ期,淋巴结检出数目对预后的预测价值仍存在争议。

方法

研究了淋巴结检出数目与临床病理因素的关系,以及其对Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期结直肠癌预后的意义。共分析了 16865 例接受 R0 切除的 T3/T4 结直肠癌患者。

结果

所有病例的淋巴结检出数算术平均值为 20.0。淋巴结检出数因几种临床病理变量而异,差异有统计学意义,淋巴结清扫范围的差异最大。Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期的生存与淋巴结检出数显著相关。Ⅱ期结肠癌淋巴结检出数≤9 枚和>27 枚的患者 5 年总生存率相差 6.4%,Ⅲ期结肠癌相差 8.8%,Ⅱ期直肠癌相差 12.5%,Ⅲ期直肠癌相差 10.6%。每增加一个淋巴结的检出,Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期的死亡风险分别降低 2.1%和 0.8%。未获得淋巴结检出数的截断值。

结论

淋巴结检出数不仅在Ⅱ期,而且在Ⅲ期结直肠癌中也是一个重要的预后变量,其主要由淋巴结清扫范围决定。未发现淋巴结检出数的截断值,有必要进行适当的淋巴结清扫并尽可能检查更多的淋巴结。

相似文献

1
Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer.淋巴结清扫数目是影响 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者生存的重要决定因素。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan;42(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr164. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
2
Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer.II期结直肠癌的淋巴结检查数量与预后
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jan;41(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.010.
3
[Impact of number of retrieved lymph nodes and lymph node ratio on the prognosis in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer].[Ⅱ、Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者中获取淋巴结数量及淋巴结比率对预后的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;14(4):249-53.
4
Predictive factors affecting survival in stage II colorectal cancer: is lymph node harvesting relevant?影响 II 期结直肠癌生存的预测因素:淋巴结清扫是否相关?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1517-23. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f20116.
5
How many lymph nodes should be examined in Dukes' B colorectal cancer? Determination on the basis of cumulative survival rate.在杜克B期结直肠癌中应检查多少个淋巴结?基于累积生存率的判定。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1703-6.
6
The influence of the number of retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer undergoing tumor-specific mesorectal excision.接受肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术的II期和III期直肠癌患者中,清扫淋巴结数量对分期及生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):965-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a6cc25.
7
The number of analyzed lymph nodes - a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.分析的淋巴结数量——结直肠癌的一个预后因素。
Acta Oncol. 2007;46(7):975-81. doi: 10.1080/02841860701203537.
8
Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer.淋巴结比率在 III 期结直肠癌中的预后价值。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):1116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02435.x.
9
Application of propensity score model to examine the prognostic significance of lymph node number as a care quality indicator.应用倾向评分模型探讨淋巴结计数作为护理质量指标的预后意义。
Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;21(2):e75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
10
Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined.结直肠肿瘤标本的淋巴结回收:关于建议检查的最少淋巴结数量
World J Surg. 2002 Mar;26(3):384-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0236-8. Epub 2002 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus Standard Resection for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术与标准切除术的长期肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 May 31;56(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01248-2.
2
Lymph node harvest as a predictor of survival for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.淋巴结清扫作为结肠癌生存的预测指标:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Jun 15;14:100190. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100190. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional open proctectomy for locally advanced colon cancer.
经肛门内镜微创手术与传统开腹直肠切除术治疗局部进展期结肠癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 15;103(11):e37474. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037474.
4
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove tecnologie) network prospective study on the approach to right colon lymphadenectomy in Italy: is there a standard?-CoDIG 2 (ColonDx Italian Group).腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:意大利 SICE(意大利内镜外科学和新技术学会)网络前瞻性研究,探讨意大利右半结肠淋巴结清扫术的方法:是否存在标准?-CoDIG 2(结肠诊断意大利组)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1432-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10607-8. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
5
Developing prognostic nomograms to predict overall survival and cancer-specific survival in synchronous multiple primary colorectal cancer based on the SEER database.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库开发预测同步性多原发性结直肠癌总生存期和癌症特异性生存期的预后列线图。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(15):14057-14070. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05221-z. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.机器人与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术行完整结肠系膜切除术治疗左侧结肠癌:一项采用倾向评分匹配分析的多中心研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):569-578. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02788-0. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.机器人与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术行完整结肠系膜切除术治疗左侧结肠癌的多中心研究:倾向评分匹配分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02781-7. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
8
The effect of carbon nanoparticles staining on lymph node tracking in colorectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.碳纳米颗粒染色对结直肠癌淋巴结追踪的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 1;10:1113659. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113659. eCollection 2023.
9
Benefit of Uracil-Tegafur Used as a Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIA Colon Cancer.尿嘧啶替加氟作为 IIA 期结肠癌术后辅助化疗的获益。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 20;59(1):10. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010010.
10
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy node retrieval in the obese population.肥胖人群中行机器人右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的淋巴结检出效果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1349-1355. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01529-7. Epub 2023 Jan 13.