• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术行完整结肠系膜切除术治疗左侧结肠癌:一项采用倾向评分匹配分析的多中心研究。

Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.

机构信息

Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):569-578. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02788-0. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-023-02788-0
PMID:37014449
Abstract

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery for right-sided colon and rectal cancer has rapidly increased; however, there is limited evidence in the literature of advantages of robotic left colectomy (RLC) for left-sided colon cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of RLC versus laparoscopic left colectomy (LLC) with complete mesocolic excision (CME) for left-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients who had RLC or LLC with CME for left-sided colon cancer at five hospitals in China between January 2014 and April 2022 were included. A one-to-one propensity score matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was postoperative complications occurring within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival, overall survival and the number of harvested lymph nodes.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients (187 male; median age 61.0 [20.0-85.0] years) were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 102 patients in each group. The clinicopathological characteristics were well-matched between groups. The two groups did not differ in estimated blood loss, conversion to open rate, time to first flatus, reoperation rate, or postoperative length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). RLC was associated with a longer operation time (192.9 ± 53.2 vs. 168.9 ± 52.8 min, p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the RLC and LLC groups (18.6% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.856). The total number of lymph nodes harvested in the RLC group was higher than that in the LLC group (15.7 ± 8.3 vs. 12.1 ± 5.9, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 3-year and 5-year overall survival or 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Compared to laparoscopic surgery, RLC with CME for left-sided colon cancer was found to be associated with higher numbers of lymph nodes harvested and similar postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes.

摘要

目的

机器人右半结肠癌和直肠癌手术迅速增加;然而,关于机器人左半结肠切除术(RLC)治疗左半结肠癌的优势,文献中的证据有限。本研究旨在比较 RLC 与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术(LLC)联合完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗左半结肠癌的结果。

方法

纳入 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月期间中国五家医院接受 RLC 或 LLC 联合 CME 治疗左半结肠癌的患者。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配分析来减少混杂因素。主要结局是术后 30 天内发生的术后并发症。次要结局是无病生存率、总生存率和采集的淋巴结数量。

结果

共有 292 名患者(187 名男性;中位年龄 61.0 [20.0-85.0] 岁)符合本研究条件,经倾向评分匹配后每组各有 102 名患者。两组的临床病理特征匹配良好。两组在估计出血量、中转开腹率、首次排气时间、再手术率和术后住院时间方面无差异(p>0.05)。RLC 手术时间较长(192.9±53.2 比 168.9±52.8 min,p=0.001)。RLC 和 LLC 两组术后并发症发生率无差异(18.6%比 17.6%,p=0.856)。RLC 组采集的淋巴结总数高于 LLC 组(15.7±8.3 比 12.1±5.9,p<0.001)。3 年和 5 年总生存率以及 3 年和 5 年无病生存率无显著差异。

结论

与腹腔镜手术相比,RLC 联合 CME 治疗左半结肠癌与采集更多的淋巴结数量以及相似的术后并发症和长期生存结果相关。

相似文献

1
Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.机器人与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术行完整结肠系膜切除术治疗左侧结肠癌:一项采用倾向评分匹配分析的多中心研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):569-578. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02788-0. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.机器人与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术行完整结肠系膜切除术治疗左侧结肠癌的多中心研究:倾向评分匹配分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02781-7. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
3
Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.机器人或三维(3D)腹腔镜用于完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)和腔内吻合的右半结肠切除术?倾向评分匹配研究比较。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2039-2048. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07600-w. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus conventional resection for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes.腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术与传统切除术治疗右侧结肠癌:短期结局的倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3049-3058. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08601-z. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching.单部位腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的长期疗效:与传统多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术使用倾向评分匹配法的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000810.
6
Robotic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right colonic tumours - a propensity score-matching study comparing with standard laparoscopy.机器人全结肠系膜切除术联合中央血管结扎治疗右半结肠癌——一项倾向评分匹配研究,与标准腹腔镜手术比较。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab016.
7
Mid-term oncological outcomes after complete versus conventional mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除与传统结肠系膜切除的中期肿瘤学结果比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6489-6496. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-09001-z. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Rates between Patients Who Underwent Robotic and Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-Sided Colon Cancer.比较机器人与腹腔镜右半结肠癌完整系膜切除术患者的术后结局和长期生存率。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Oct;34(10):890-897. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0144. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
9
Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis.腹腔镜下改良的结肠系膜整块切除术联合中央血管结扎术治疗右半结肠癌的短期和长期疗效优于开放手术,这在倾向评分分析中得到了证实。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2721-2731. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5970-6. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Inferior versus medial approach in laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon cancer: A propensity-score-matched analysis.完全结肠系膜切除及D3淋巴结清扫的腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中下侧入路与内侧入路的倾向评分匹配分析
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan;25(1):56-65. doi: 10.1111/codi.16327. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.机器人与腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗结肠癌的肿瘤学结局:ACS-NSQIP 分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Sep 17;18(1):341. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02097-0.
2
Minimally invasive left colectomy with total intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis. A single center cohort study. Stage 2b IDEAL framework for evaluating surgical innovation.经肛门全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术与腹腔镜辅助左半结肠切除术的对比:一项单中心队列研究。2b 期 IDEAL 框架用于评估外科创新。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jul 19;409(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03387-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic left colectomy for radical treatment of colon cancer: a retrospective analysis in a consecutive series of 211 patients.开放、腹腔镜和机器人左半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的比较:211 例连续患者的回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;20(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02796-8.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌(REAL):一项多中心随机对照试验的短期结果
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):991-1004. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection for the treatment of stage II and III sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
机器人与腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术治疗Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期乙状结肠癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 10;18(1):207. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01967-x.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colon Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes-A Focus on Studies from 2020-2024.腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助手术治疗结肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析:疗效、安全性及结局——聚焦2020年至2024年的研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):1552. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081552.
Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.
机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术的短期和长期疗效:倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106855. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106855. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;37(7):1497-1507. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04194-8. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
5
Mid-term oncological outcomes after complete versus conventional mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除与传统结肠系膜切除的中期肿瘤学结果比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6489-6496. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-09001-z. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
The oncologic safety of left colectomy with modified complete mesocolic excision for distal transverse colon cancer: Comparison with descending colon cancer.左半结肠切除术联合改良全结肠系膜切除术治疗远端横结肠癌的肿瘤学安全性:与降结肠癌的比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2857-2864. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.048. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study.机器人与腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术治疗结肠癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2147-2158. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03966-y. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) for Right-sided Colon Cancer: Short-term Outcomes. A Randomized Clinical Study.腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗右半结肠癌的可行性和安全性:短期结果。一项随机临床研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 1;274(1):57-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004557.
9
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Sep;16(5):979-989. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_533_18.
10
Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy with extra-corporeal or intra-corporeal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与机器人右半结肠切除术伴体外或体内吻合术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1317-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01985-x. Epub 2020 Sep 9.