K.U. Leuven, Medical Imaging Research Center, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering - ESAT, Center for Processing Speech and Images, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;41(3):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
The capacity to process three-dimensional facial surfaces to objectively assess outcomes of craniomaxillofacial care is urgently required. Available surface registration techniques depart from conventional facial anthropometrics by not including anatomical relationship in their analysis. Current registrations rely on the manual selection of areas or points that have not moved during surgery, introducing subjectivity. An improved technique is proposed based on the concept of an anthropometric mask (AM) combined with robust superimposition. The AM is the equivalent to landmark definitions, as used in traditional anthropometrics, but described in a spatially dense way using (∼10.000) quasi-landmarks. A robust superimposition is performed to align surface images facilitating accurate measurement of spatial differences between corresponding quasi-landmarks. The assessment describes magnitude and direction of change objectively and can be displayed graphically. The technique was applied to three patients, without any modification and prior knowledge: a 4-year-old boy with Treacher-Collins syndrome in a resting and smiling pose; surgical correction for hemimandibular hypoplasia; and mandibular hypoplasia with staged orthognathic procedures. Comparisons were made with a reported closest-point (CP) strategy. Contrasting outcomes were found where the CP strategy resulted in anatomical implausibility whilst the AM technique was parsimonious to expected differences.
迫切需要能够处理三维面部表面以客观评估颅颌面护理结果的能力。现有的表面配准技术在分析中不包括解剖关系,与传统的面部人体测量学不同。目前的配准依赖于手动选择在手术过程中没有移动的区域或点,这引入了主观性。本文提出了一种基于人体测量面具(AM)和稳健叠加的改进技术。AM 与传统人体测量学中使用的标志定义相当,但使用(约 10000)准标志以空间密集的方式描述。进行稳健叠加以对齐表面图像,从而便于准确测量相应准标志之间的空间差异。该技术可以客观地描述变化的大小和方向,并以图形方式显示。该技术应用于三名患者,无需任何修改和先验知识:一名患有特雷彻-柯林斯综合征的 4 岁男孩处于休息和微笑姿势;单侧下颌骨发育不全的手术矫正;以及分期正颌手术治疗的下颌骨发育不全。与报道的最近点(CP)策略进行了比较。CP 策略导致解剖不合理,而 AM 技术与预期差异相符,结果存在差异。