From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;118(6):1402-1408. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182392977.
Traditionally, obstetricians have grouped together all pregnancy losses before the mid-second trimester as spontaneous abortions. However, this nomenclature is arbitrary, outdated, and not clinically useful. Using this system, miscarriages due to genetic abnormalities, fetal deaths associated with abnormal placental growth and development, and spontaneous preterm births of liveborn fetuses at previable gestations are lumped together in a single category. In addition, the term abortion is fraught with emotional connotations for families suffering the loss of a pregnancy. Thus, whereas the existing classification for pregnancy loss has served a somewhat pragmatic role, it ignores precepts of developmental biology and the clinical realities of these adverse pregnancy outcomes. In this article, we propose a more useful nomenclature for pregnancy loss and preterm births that is informative and is based on developmental periods in gestation and shared pathophysiology.
传统上,产科医生将所有孕中期前的妊娠丢失都归为自然流产。然而,这种命名法是随意的、过时的,且在临床上没有用处。使用这种系统,由于遗传异常导致的流产、与异常胎盘生长和发育相关的胎儿死亡以及在可行孕周之前的活产儿自发性早产都被归为同一类别。此外,“堕胎”一词对于经历妊娠丢失的家庭来说带有强烈的情感色彩。因此,尽管现有的妊娠丢失分类在某种程度上具有实用性,但它忽略了发育生物学的原理和这些不良妊娠结局的临床现实。在本文中,我们提出了一种更有用的妊娠丢失和早产命名法,它具有信息性且基于妊娠的发育阶段和共同的病理生理学。