• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估新西兰恢复性家庭护理服务的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。

Assessing the impact of a restorative home care service in New Zealand: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Jul;20(4):365-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01039.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01039.x
PMID:22106952
Abstract

Due to the ageing population, there is an increased demand for home care services. Restorative care is one approach to improving home care services, although there is little evidence to support its use in the community setting. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the impact of a restorative home care service for community-dwelling older people. The study was a cluster randomised controlled trial undertaken at a home care agency in New Zealand. The study period was from December 2005 to May 2007. Older people were interviewed face-to-face at baseline, four and 7 months. A total of 186 older people who received assistance from a home care agency participated in the study, 93 received restorative home care and 93 older people received usual home care. The primary outcome measure was change in health-related quality of life (measured by the Short Form 36 [SF36] Health Survey). Secondary outcomes were the physical, mental, and social well-being of older people (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living, Timed Up and Go, Mastery scale, Duke Social Support Index). Findings revealed that compared with usual care, the intervention demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in health-related quality of life (SF36) at 7 months for older people (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI -0.0 to 7.7, P = 0.05). There were no changes in other scale measurements for older people in either group over time. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of older people in the intervention group identified for reduced hours or discharge (29%) compared with the control group (0%) (P < 0.001). In conclusion, a restorative home care service may be of benefit to older people, and improves home care service efficacy.

摘要

由于人口老龄化,对家庭护理服务的需求增加。康复护理是改善家庭护理服务的一种方法,但在社区环境中使用康复护理的证据很少。本试验的目的是评估社区居住的老年人康复家庭护理服务的影响。该研究是在新西兰的一家家庭护理机构进行的一项集群随机对照试验。研究期间为 2005 年 12 月至 2007 年 5 月。老年人在基线、4 个月和 7 个月时进行面对面访谈。共有 186 名接受家庭护理机构帮助的老年人参与了这项研究,93 名接受了康复家庭护理,93 名老年人接受了常规家庭护理。主要结局指标是健康相关生活质量的变化(通过短格式 36 项健康调查 [SF36] 衡量)。次要结局是老年人的身体、心理和社会福祉(诺丁汉扩展日常生活活动、计时上和去、掌握量表、杜克社会支持指数)。研究结果表明,与常规护理相比,干预在 7 个月时对老年人的健康相关生活质量(SF36)具有统计学意义上的益处(平均差异 3.8,95%CI-0.0 至 7.7,P=0.05)。在两组中,随着时间的推移,其他量表测量的老年人都没有变化。干预组中,与对照组(0%)相比,减少服务时间或出院的老年人(29%)人数存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。总之,康复家庭护理服务可能对老年人有益,并提高家庭护理服务的效果。

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of a restorative home care service in New Zealand: a cluster randomised controlled trial.评估新西兰恢复性家庭护理服务的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Jul;20(4):365-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01039.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
2
A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of a model of restorative home care on physical function and social support among older people.一项随机对照试验,旨在确定康复家庭护理模式对老年人身体功能和社会支持的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;94(6):1015-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
3
Promoting independence in frail older people: a randomised controlled trial of a restorative care service in New Zealand.促进体弱老年人的独立性:新西兰一项恢复性护理服务的随机对照试验。
Age Ageing. 2014 May;43(3):418-24. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu025. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
4
Does functionally based activity make a difference to health status and mobility? A randomised controlled trial in residential care facilities (The Promoting Independent Living Study; PILS).基于功能的活动对健康状况和行动能力有影响吗?一项在寄宿护理机构进行的随机对照试验(促进独立生活研究;PILS)。
Age Ageing. 2008 Jan;37(1):57-63. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm135. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
5
Health promotion for frail older home care clients.针对体弱居家护理老年客户的健康促进
J Adv Nurs. 2006 May;54(3):381-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03817.x.
6
Buying Time I: a prospective, controlled trial of a joint health/social care residential rehabilitation unit for older people on discharge from hospital.争取时间一:一项针对老年人出院后入住联合健康/社会护理住院康复单元的前瞻性对照试验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Jan;14(1):49-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00596.x.
7
Goal setting as a feature of homecare services for older people: does it make a difference?目标设定作为老年人家庭护理服务的一个特征:它有什么不同吗?
Age Ageing. 2012 Jan;41(1):24-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr118. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
8
Network-based rehabilitation increases formal support of frail elderly home-dwelling persons in Finland: randomised controlled trial.基于网络的康复增加了芬兰居家体弱老年人的正式支持:随机对照试验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Mar;16(2):115-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00733.x.
9
A non-randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program (HIP): an Australian restorative programme for older home-care clients.一项针对家庭独立计划(HIP)的非随机对照试验:澳大利亚为老年家庭护理客户提供的康复计划。
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 Jan;18(1):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00878.x. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
10
A randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program, an Australian restorative home-care programme for older adults.一项针对老年人的澳大利亚恢复性家庭护理计划——家庭独立计划的随机对照试验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Jan;21(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01088.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Selecting from their toolbox of interventions - A realist study of the role of occupational therapists in reablement services.从他们的干预措施工具箱中进行选择——一项关于职业治疗师在康复服务中作用的现实主义研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul;85(7):513-522. doi: 10.1177/03080226211054379. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Is functional training functional? a systematic review of its effects in community-dwelling older adults.功能训练有作用吗?对其在社区居住老年人中效果的系统评价。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024 Dec 21;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00366-3.
3
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
4
Profiling the medical, functional, cognitive, and psychosocial care needs of adults assessed for home care in Ontario, Canada: The case for long-term 'life care' at home.分析加拿大安大略省接受家庭护理评估的成年人的医疗、功能、认知和心理社会护理需求:提倡在家中进行长期“生活护理”。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0300521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300521. eCollection 2024.
5
Community based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people: systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施以维持老年人的独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Mar 21;384:e077764. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077764.
6
Home care and quality of life among community-dwelling dependent older adults in Israel: a multiple mediator model.以色列社区居住的依赖他人生活的老年人的居家护理与生活质量:一个多重中介模型
Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):507-517. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03541-8. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
7
Dilemmas in rehabilitation and patient strategies in an intensive home intervention: a follow-up study.在强化家庭干预中康复的困境和患者策略:一项随访研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2253001. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2253001.
8
Investigating the Connections Between Delivery of Care, Reablement, Workload, and Organizational Factors in Home Care Services: Mixed Methods Study.调查居家护理服务中护理提供、恢复能力、工作量与组织因素之间的联系:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 30;10:e42283. doi: 10.2196/42283.
9
Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.康复护理的出版趋势——一项范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jun 13;16:1641-1660. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S407802. eCollection 2023.
10
Impact of community care services on the health of older adults: evidence from China.社区护理服务对老年人健康的影响:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;11:1160151. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160151. eCollection 2023.