• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对老年人的澳大利亚恢复性家庭护理计划——家庭独立计划的随机对照试验。

A randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program, an Australian restorative home-care programme for older adults.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Ageing, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Jan;21(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01088.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01088.x
PMID:23009672
Abstract

A randomised controlled trial was conducted to test the effectiveness of the Home Independence Program (HIP), a restorative home-care programme for older adults, in reducing the need for ongoing services. Between June 2005 and August 2007, 750 older adults referred to a home-care service for assistance with their personal care participated in the study and received HIP or 'usual' home-care services. Service outcomes were compared at 3 and 12 months. Subgroups of 150 from each group were also compared on functional and quality of life measures. Data were analysed by 'intention-to-treat' and 'as-treated'. The intention-to-treat analysis showed at 3 and 12 months that the HIP group was significantly less likely to need ongoing personal care [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.13-0.26, P < 0.001; OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.15-0.32, P < 0.001]. Both subgroups showed improvements on the individual outcome measures over time with the only significant differences being found at 12 months for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in the as-treated analysis. Contamination of the control group by an increased emphasis on independence across the home-care agency involved, together with other methodological problems encountered, is thought to account for the few differences between groups in individual outcomes. Despite no difference between the groups over time in their overall ADL scores, a significantly smaller proportion of the HIP group required assistance with bathing/showering, the most common reason for referral, at 3 and 12 months. The results support earlier findings that participating in a short-term restorative programme appears to reduce the need for ongoing home care. The implementation of such programmes more broadly throughout Australia could substantially offset the projected increase in demand for home care associated with the five-fold projected increase in numbers of the oldest old expected over the next 40 years.

摘要

一项随机对照试验旨在测试家庭独立计划(HIP)的有效性,这是一项针对老年人的康复家庭护理计划,旨在减少对持续服务的需求。在 2005 年 6 月至 2007 年 8 月期间,750 名被转介到家庭护理服务以帮助其个人护理的老年人参与了这项研究,并接受了 HIP 或“常规”家庭护理服务。在 3 个月和 12 个月时比较了服务结果。每个组的 150 个亚组还比较了功能和生活质量措施。数据通过“意向治疗”和“实际治疗”进行分析。意向治疗分析表明,在 3 个月和 12 个月时,HIP 组需要持续个人护理的可能性显著降低[优势比(OR)=0.18,95%置信区间(CI)=0.13-0.26,P<0.001;OR=0.22,95%CI=0.15-0.32,P<0.001]。两个亚组随着时间的推移在个别结果测量上都有所改善,只有在实际治疗分析中,在 12 个月时发现日常生活活动(IADL)的工具性活动方面有显著差异。据认为,由于所涉及的家庭护理机构更加注重独立性,以及遇到的其他方法学问题,对照组受到了污染,这导致了各个组之间在个别结果方面的差异很小。尽管在日常生活活动的总体评分方面,两组之间没有随时间的变化而有所不同,但在 3 个月和 12 个月时,HIP 组需要洗澡/淋浴帮助的比例明显较小,这是转介的最常见原因。研究结果支持了早期的发现,即参与短期康复计划似乎可以减少对持续家庭护理的需求。在澳大利亚更广泛地实施此类计划可以大大抵消与未来 40 年内预计增加 5 倍的最年长人群数量相关的对家庭护理需求的预期增加。

相似文献

1
A randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program, an Australian restorative home-care programme for older adults.一项针对老年人的澳大利亚恢复性家庭护理计划——家庭独立计划的随机对照试验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Jan;21(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01088.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
2
A non-randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program (HIP): an Australian restorative programme for older home-care clients.一项针对家庭独立计划(HIP)的非随机对照试验:澳大利亚为老年家庭护理客户提供的康复计划。
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 Jan;18(1):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00878.x. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
3
Assessing the impact of a restorative home care service in New Zealand: a cluster randomised controlled trial.评估新西兰恢复性家庭护理服务的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Jul;20(4):365-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01039.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
4
Effects of two models of nutritional intervention on homebound older adults at nutritional risk.两种营养干预模式对居家有营养风险老年人的影响。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Mar;103(3):329-36. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50052.
5
Promoting independence in frail older people: a randomised controlled trial of a restorative care service in New Zealand.促进体弱老年人的独立性:新西兰一项恢复性护理服务的随机对照试验。
Age Ageing. 2014 May;43(3):418-24. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu025. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
6
A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of a model of restorative home care on physical function and social support among older people.一项随机对照试验,旨在确定康复家庭护理模式对老年人身体功能和社会支持的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;94(6):1015-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Enabling independence: restorative approaches to home care provision for frail older adults.使老年人能够独立生活:为体弱老年人提供家庭护理的恢复性方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2009 May;17(3):225-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00809.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
8
[Effects of case management using Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) in home health services for older people].[使用居家护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC)进行病例管理在老年人居家健康服务中的效果]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009 Jun;39(3):366-75. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.3.366.
9
A randomized trial of a multicomponent home intervention to reduce functional difficulties in older adults.一项多成分家庭干预措施以减少老年人功能障碍的随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):809-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00703.x.
10
Functional status and use of health care services: longitudinal study on the older adult population in Spain.功能状态与医疗服务利用:西班牙老年人口的纵向研究
Maturitas. 2007 Dec 20;58(4):377-86. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.09.008. Epub 2007 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
2
Community based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people: systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施以维持老年人的独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Mar 21;384:e077764. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077764.
3
Dilemmas in rehabilitation and patient strategies in an intensive home intervention: a follow-up study.
在强化家庭干预中康复的困境和患者策略:一项随访研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2253001. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2253001.
4
Exploring Goals and Functional Changes in Reablement for People with Fractures and People with Dizziness and Balance Problems.探索骨折患者以及头晕和平衡问题患者康复的目标及功能变化。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Aug 15;16:2323-2337. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S417883. eCollection 2023.
5
Complex interventions for improving independent living and quality of life amongst community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社区居住的老年人提高独立生活和生活质量的复杂干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2023 Jul 1;52(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad132.
6
Investigating the Connections Between Delivery of Care, Reablement, Workload, and Organizational Factors in Home Care Services: Mixed Methods Study.调查居家护理服务中护理提供、恢复能力、工作量与组织因素之间的联系:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 30;10:e42283. doi: 10.2196/42283.
7
Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.康复护理的出版趋势——一项范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jun 13;16:1641-1660. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S407802. eCollection 2023.
8
Effects on clients' daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: a systematic literature review.对客户日常功能的影响以及康复干预的共同特征:一项系统的文献综述。
Eur J Ageing. 2022 May 3;19(4):903-929. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00693-3. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
An investigation of Reablement or restorative homecare interventions  and outcome effects: A systematic review of randomised control trials.Reablement 或康复性家庭护理干预措施及效果的调查:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6586-e6600. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14108. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
10
Reablement - relevant factors for implementation: an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study design.再康复 - 实施的相关因素:探索性序贯混合方法研究设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08355-x.