• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对因精神错乱而宣判无罪者的监管:康涅狄格州的精神病安全审查委员会。

Monitoring insanity acquittees: Connecticut's psychiatric security review board.

作者信息

Scott D C, Zonana H V, Getz M A

机构信息

Forensic Services, Connecticut Department of Mental Health, Middletown.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;41(9):980-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.9.980.

DOI:10.1176/ps.41.9.980
PMID:2210707
Abstract

In 1985 Connecticut established an administrative psychiatric security review board to monitor the postverdict disposition of defendants found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. The five-member board may confine an insanity acquittee in a mental hospital, grant temporary leave, order conditional release, and terminate confinement or conditional release. Judicial review is required before a patient is discharged from the board's custody. Between 1985 and 1989, a total of 173 insanity acquittees were under the board's jurisdiction; most were hospitalized in state psychiatric facilities. The authors discuss issues that must be addressed in creating a psychiatric security review board, including the conflict between protecting the public and treating insanity acquittees, clinicians' resistance to treating these patients, and problems posed by patients who do not appear to be mentally ill or who are well known to the public.

摘要

1985年,康涅狄格州设立了一个行政性的精神病安全审查委员会,以监督因精神疾病或缺陷而被判定无罪的被告在判决后的处置情况。这个由五名成员组成的委员会可以将被判定为精神错乱无罪的人关押在精神病院,批准临时离开,下令有条件释放,并终止关押或有条件释放。在患者从委员会的监管中出院之前,需要进行司法审查。1985年至1989年期间,共有173名被判定为精神错乱无罪的人在该委员会的管辖之下;大多数人被收治在州立精神病设施中。作者讨论了在设立精神病安全审查委员会时必须解决的问题,包括保护公众与治疗被判定为精神错乱无罪的人之间的冲突、临床医生对治疗这些患者的抵触情绪,以及那些看似没有精神疾病或为公众所熟知的患者所带来的问题。

相似文献

1
Monitoring insanity acquittees: Connecticut's psychiatric security review board.对因精神错乱而宣判无罪者的监管:康涅狄格州的精神病安全审查委员会。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;41(9):980-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.9.980.
2
Assessing Insanity Acquittee Recidivism in Connecticut.评估康涅狄格州被判定精神错乱无罪者的再犯罪情况。
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Mar;34(2-3):423-43. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2222. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Lifetime police contacts of discharged Psychiatric Security Review Board clients.已出院的精神科安全审查委员会客户与警方的终身接触情况。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1986;8(2):189-202. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(86)90034-8.
4
The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.因精神错乱而被判定无罪的患者对精神病学改革的重要性。
Psychiatriki. 2016 Jul-Sep;27(3):165-168. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.165.
5
The Value of Conditional Release for Insanity Acquittees.精神错乱被告的有条件释放的价值。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2023 Sep;51(3):353-356. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.230062-23. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
6
Closing Italian Forensic Psychiatry Hospitals in Favor of Treating Insanity Acquittees in the Community.关闭意大利法医精神病医院,转而支持在社区治疗因精神错乱而宣判无罪者。
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Mar;34(2-3):444-59. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2234.
7
The Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board: 1978-2012.俄勒冈州精神卫生安全审查委员会:1978-2012 年。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(4):560-7.
8
Predicting success on conditional release for insanity acquittees: regionalized versus nonregionalized hospital patients.预测因精神错乱而被宣告无罪者有条件释放的成功率:地区性医院患者与非地区性医院患者的对比
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1992;20(1):87-100.
9
Criminal recidivism among insanity acquittees.被判定为精神错乱而无罪者中的再次犯罪情况。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982;5(3-4):365-75. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(82)90030-9.
10
Disposition of insanity acquittees in Illinois.伊利诺伊州被判定因精神错乱而无罪者的处置情况。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1988;16(1):11-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Administrative issues in the follow-up treatment of insanity acquittees.精神错乱宣判无罪者后续治疗中的行政问题。
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Fall;18(3):242-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02518595.
2
Designing conditional release systems for insanity acquittees.
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Fall;18(3):231-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02518594.