VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Apr;38(4):466-76. doi: 10.1177/0146167211429449. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
The present research demonstrates that pride has divergent effects on prejudice, exacerbating or attenuating evaluative biases against stigmatized groups, depending on the form of pride experienced. Specifically, three experiments found that hubristic pride--associated with arrogance and self-aggrandizement--promotes prejudice and discrimination, whereas authentic pride--associated with self-confidence and accomplishment--promotes more positive attitudes toward outgroups and stigmatized individuals. Findings generalized to discriminatory judgments (Experiment 2) and were found to be mediated by empathic concern for the evaluative target. Together, these experiments suggest that pride may be a cause of everyday prejudice and discrimination but that these social consequences depend on whether hubristic or authentic pride is experienced, and the degree to which empathic concern is subsequently aroused.
本研究表明,骄傲对偏见有不同的影响,根据所经历的骄傲形式,会加剧或减轻对污名化群体的评价偏见。具体来说,三项实验发现,与傲慢和自我夸大相关的傲慢型骄傲会促进偏见和歧视,而与自信和成就相关的真正型骄傲则会促进对外群体和受污名化个体的更积极态度。研究结果推广到歧视性判断(实验 2),并发现其受到对评价目标的共情关注的中介作用。总的来说,这些实验表明,骄傲可能是日常偏见和歧视的原因,但这些社会后果取决于所经历的是傲慢型骄傲还是真正型骄傲,以及随后唤起的共情关注程度。