• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些患者在低容量医院接受复杂癌症手术?

Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals?

机构信息

Minnesota Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jan;214(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.003
PMID:22112418
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous literature has consistently shown worse operative outcomes at low-volume hospitals (LVH) after complex cancer surgery. Whether patient-related factors impact this association remains unknown. We hypothesize that patient-related factors contribute to receipt of complex cancer surgery at LVH.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the 2003-2008 National Inpatient Sample, we identified 59,841 patients who underwent cancer operations for lung, esophagus, and pancreas tumors. Logistic regression models were used to examine the impact of sociodemographic factors on receipt of complex cancer surgery at LVH.

RESULTS

Overall, 38.4% received their cancer surgery at LVH. A higher proportion of esophagectomies were performed at LVH (70.3%), followed by pancreatectomy (38.2%) and lung resection (33.8%). Patients who were non-white, with non-private insurance, and had more comorbidities were all more likely to receive their cancer surgery at LVH (for all, p < 0.05). Multivariate analyses continued to demonstrate that non-white race, insurance status, increased comorbidities, region, and nonelective admission predicted receipt of cancer surgery at LVH across all 3 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large national study, non-white race and increased comorbidities contributed to receipt of cancer surgery at LVH. Patient selection and access to high-volume hospitals are likely reasons worthy of additional investigation. This study provides additional insight into the volume-outcomes relationship. Given the demonstrated outcomes disparity between high-volume hospitals and LVH, future policy and research should encourage mechanisms for referral of patients with cancer to high-volume hospitals for their surgical care.

摘要

背景

先前的文献一致表明,在接受复杂癌症手术后,低容量医院(LVH)的手术效果较差。患者相关因素是否会影响这种关联尚不清楚。我们假设患者相关因素会影响在 LVH 进行复杂癌症手术的选择。

研究设计

利用 2003-2008 年全国住院患者样本,我们确定了 59841 例接受肺癌、食管癌和胰腺癌手术的癌症患者。使用逻辑回归模型来检验社会人口因素对在 LVH 接受复杂癌症手术的影响。

结果

总体而言,38.4%的患者在 LVH 接受了癌症手术。LVH 进行的食管癌切除术比例较高(70.3%),其次是胰切除术(38.2%)和肺切除术(33.8%)。非白人、非私人保险和合并症较多的患者在 LVH 接受癌症手术的比例更高(所有患者,p<0.05)。多变量分析继续表明,非白人种族、保险状况、合并症增多、地区和非择期入院均预测了这 3 种手术在 LVH 中的接受情况。

结论

在这项大型全国性研究中,非白人种族和合并症增多导致了在 LVH 接受癌症手术。患者选择和获得高容量医院可能是值得进一步研究的原因。这项研究为容量-结果关系提供了更多的见解。鉴于高容量医院和 LVH 之间已经存在的结果差异,未来的政策和研究应鼓励将癌症患者转诊至高容量医院接受手术治疗的机制。

相似文献

1
Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals?哪些患者在低容量医院接受复杂癌症手术?
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jan;214(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
2
Association of Discretionary Hospital Volume Standards for High-risk Cancer Surgery With Patient Outcomes and Access, 2005-2016.2005-2016 年,高危癌症手术医院容量标准的酌处权与患者结局和可及性的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1005-1012. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3017.
3
The Impact of Hospital Size on National Trends and Outcomes Following Open Esophagectomy.医院规模对开放性食管切除术后全国趋势及预后的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Oct 3;55(10):669. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100669.
4
Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study.八旬老人接受高风险癌症手术的结果:一项全国性研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Dec;205(6):729-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.307. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
5
Variation in value among hospitals performing complex cancer operations.不同医院执行复杂癌症手术的价值差异。
Surgery. 2020 Jul;168(1):106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Are minimum volume standards appropriate for lung and esophageal surgery?肺和食管手术的最低容量标准合适吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2683-2694.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.073. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Exploring the burden of inpatient readmissions after major cancer surgery.探索重大癌症手术后住院再入院的负担。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 10;33(5):455-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5938. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
8
Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.美国新闻与世界报道排名靠前的医院与非排名医院复杂胃肠道癌症切除术的结果比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jul;233(1):21-27.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
9
Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy: A Population-based Study in England.外科医生手术量与食管癌切除术、胃癌切除术和胰十二指肠切除术:一项基于英格兰人群的研究。
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):727-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001490.
10
Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.对加利福尼亚州重大癌症手术死亡率与医院手术量之间关系的认识是否产生了影响?:另一个十年的随访分析。
Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):472-83. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b47c79.

引用本文的文献

1
Racioethnic disparities in comorbidities and outcomes following head and neck oncologic surgery.头颈部肿瘤手术后合并症及预后的种族差异。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 May 8;11(1):74-85. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.178. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Travel to High-Volume Centers and Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer.前往高容量医疗中心就医与食管癌切除术后的生存情况
JAMA Surg. 2025 Jan 1;160(1):19-27. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5009.
3
Impact of Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on lung cancer care in the US.
《患者保护与平价医疗法案》下医疗补助扩大对美国肺癌治疗的影响
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):5604-5614. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-786. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Overall Volume of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Positively Impacts Gastric Cancer Outcomes at Centers with Low Gastrectomy Volume.总体上消化道手术量对胃切除术量低的中心的胃癌结局有积极影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5293-5303. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15381-y. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Increased Time to Fixation After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Influenced by Race and Insurance Status.种族和保险状况对创伤性脊髓损伤后固定时间延长的影响
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1129-1135. doi: 10.1177/21925682231225175. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
6
Regionalizing ovarian cancer cytoreduction to high-volume centers and the impact on patient travel in New York State.将卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术的区域性分配给高容量中心,以及对纽约州患者出行的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Mar;182:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Racial Disparity in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treatment and Survival in the United States.美国食管鳞状细胞癌治疗和生存中的种族差异。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 May 1;119(5):830-836. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002606. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
8
The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Early-Stage Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at High- Versus Low-Volume Facilities.医疗补助扩张对高容量与低容量医疗机构早期胰腺癌的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7263-7274. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13810-y. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
9
Exploring the Surgical Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer Resections Performed in Low- Versus High-Volume Centers.探索在低手术量与高手术量中心进行的胰腺癌切除术的手术结果。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 4;15(4):e37112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37112. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Surgical Treatment at an Academic Medical Center is Associated with Statistically Insignificant Lung Cancer Survival Outcome Differences Related to ZIP Code.学术医疗中心的手术治疗与邮政编码相关的肺癌生存结果差异无统计学意义。
World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):2052-2064. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07006-4. Epub 2023 Apr 12.