UMR 1202 Biodiversité Gènes et Communautés, Université de Bordeaux, Talence, 33400, France.
BMC Ecol. 2011 Nov 24;11:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-11-28.
To identify the determinants of invasiveness, comparisons of traits of invasive and native species are commonly performed. Invasiveness is generally linked to higher values of reproductive, physiological and growth-related traits of the invasives relative to the natives in the introduced range. Phenotypic plasticity of these traits has also been cited to increase the success of invasive species but has been little studied in invasive tree species. In a greenhouse experiment, we compared ecophysiological traits between an invasive species to Europe, Acer negundo, and early- and late-successional co-occurring native species, under different light, nutrient availability and disturbance regimes. We also compared species of the same species groups in situ, in riparian forests.
Under non-limiting resources, A. negundo seedlings showed higher growth rates than the native species. However, A. negundo displayed equivalent or lower photosynthetic capacities and nitrogen content per unit leaf area compared to the native species; these findings were observed both on the seedlings in the greenhouse experiment and on adult trees in situ. These physiological traits were mostly conservative along the different light, nutrient and disturbance environments. Overall, under non-limiting light and nutrient conditions, specific leaf area and total leaf area of A. negundo were substantially larger. The invasive species presented a higher plasticity in allocation to foliage and therefore in growth with increasing nutrient and light availability relative to the native species.
The higher level of plasticity of the invasive species in foliage allocation in response to light and nutrient availability induced a better growth in non-limiting resource environments. These results give us more elements on the invasiveness of A. negundo and suggest that such behaviour could explain the ability of A. negundo to outperform native tree species, contributes to its spread in European resource-rich riparian forests and impedes its establishment under closed-canopy hardwood forests.
为了确定入侵性的决定因素,通常会比较入侵种和本地种的特征。在引入的范围内,相对于本地种,入侵种的生殖、生理和生长相关特征的较高值通常与入侵性相关。这些特征的表型可塑性也被认为会增加入侵物种的成功,但在入侵树种中研究甚少。在温室实验中,我们比较了欧洲入侵物种 Acer negundo 与早期和晚期同时存在的本地种之间的生态生理特征,在不同的光照、养分供应和干扰制度下。我们还比较了同一物种组在河岸林的原地物种。
在非限制资源下,A. negundo 幼苗的生长速度高于本地种。然而,与本地种相比,A. negundo 的光合能力和单位叶面积的氮含量相当或较低;这些发现无论是在温室实验中的幼苗还是在原地的成年树上都观察到了。这些生理特征在不同的光照、养分和干扰环境中大多是保守的。总的来说,在非限制光照和养分条件下,A. negundo 的比叶面积和总叶面积要大得多。与本地种相比,入侵种在分配到叶片和因此在生长方面的分配具有更高的可塑性,随着养分和光照供应的增加。
入侵种在叶片分配方面对光照和养分供应的较高可塑性导致了在非限制资源环境中更好的生长。这些结果为我们提供了更多关于 A. negundo 入侵性的信息,并表明这种行为可能解释了 A. negundo 超过本地树种的能力,有助于其在欧洲资源丰富的河岸林的传播,并阻碍了其在封闭林冠硬木林中的建立。