Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Lowy Packer Building, 405 Liverpool St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Heart. 2012 Feb;98(4):282-90. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300751. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
Experimental studies demonstrate that granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) promotes neovascularisation and confers cardioprotection.
To assess the efficacy of repeated low dose G-CSF plus exercise on myocardial ischaemia in patients with severe chronic ischaemic heart disease.
18 patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III-IV angina completed a randomised, double blind, crossover study of dose adjusted G-CSF versus placebo. Exercise was commenced 6 weeks prior and continued for the duration of the study. G-CSF or placebo was administered daily for 5 consecutive days at fortnightly intervals for three cycles, followed by crossover after 6 weeks. Primary outcome was myocardial perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondary outcomes were: Seattle Angina and Utility Based Quality of Life Heart Questionnaire (SAQ/UBQ-H), Exercise Stress Test (EST) and quantification of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) by flow cytometry and angiogenic cytokines by immunoassay.
Compared with placebo, G-CSF had no effect on myocardial ischaemia by cardiac MRI, EST or SAQ/UBQ-H, despite effective EPC mobilisation (peak fold increase: CD34+ =19, CD34+ CD133+ = 37, CD34+ vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)+ = 5, CD34+ CD133+ VEGFR-2+ = 3; all p<0.05 vs. placebo). Plasma levels of stromal cell derived factor 1, angiopoietin 1, interleukin 8 and tumour necrosis factor α decreased after a symptom limited EST while vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet derived growth factor remained unchanged. All cytokines were unchanged following G-CSF. Seven troponin I positive events occurred with G-CSF compared with three with placebo (p=0.289). High sensitivity C reactive protein and N terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide increased with G-CSF (both p<0.01 vs. placebo).
In patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease, G-CSF mobilises EPCs but does not improve myocardial perfusion or angina. G-CSF increases plasma levels of adverse prognostic cardiac biomarkers. Clinical trial registration information Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN012607000354482.
实验研究表明,粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可促进新生血管形成并提供心脏保护。
评估重复小剂量 G-CSF 联合运动对严重慢性缺血性心脏病患者心肌缺血的疗效。
18 名加拿大心血管学会(CCS)III-IV 级心绞痛患者完成了一项随机、双盲、交叉研究,比较了剂量调整的 G-CSF 与安慰剂。运动在 6 周前开始,并在研究期间持续进行。G-CSF 或安慰剂每两周连续 5 天给药,共 3 个周期,然后在 6 周后进行交叉。主要结局指标是心脏磁共振成像(MRI)评估的心肌灌注。次要结局指标为西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)和基于效用的生活质量心脏问卷(UBQ-H)、运动应激试验(EST)以及通过流式细胞术定量内皮祖细胞(EPC)和免疫测定法定量血管生成细胞因子。
与安慰剂相比,G-CSF 对心脏 MRI、EST 或 SAQ/UBQ-H 评估的心肌缺血没有影响,尽管 EPC 动员有效(CD34+:增加 19 倍;CD34+ CD133+:增加 37 倍;CD34+血管内皮生长因子受体 2(VEGFR-2)+:增加 5 倍;CD34+ CD133+ VEGFR-2+:增加 3 倍;均 p<0.05 与安慰剂相比)。在症状限制的 EST 后,基质细胞衍生因子 1、血管生成素 1、白细胞介素 8 和肿瘤坏死因子-α 的血浆水平下降,而血管内皮生长因子和血小板衍生生长因子保持不变。G-CSF 后所有细胞因子均无变化。与安慰剂相比,G-CSF 组发生 7 次肌钙蛋白 I 阳性事件,安慰剂组发生 3 次(p=0.289)。高敏 C 反应蛋白和 N 端脑利钠肽前体随 G-CSF 增加(均 p<0.01 与安慰剂相比)。
在慢性缺血性心脏病患者中,G-CSF 可动员 EPC,但不能改善心肌灌注或心绞痛。G-CSF 增加了血浆中不良预后的心脏生物标志物水平。临床试验注册信息 澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心:http://www.anzctr.org.au。独特标识符:ACTRN012607000354482。