Engelmann Markus G, Theiss Hans D, Hennig-Theiss Christine, Huber Armin, Wintersperger Bernd J, Werle-Ruedinger Anja-Eva, Schoenberg Stefan O, Steinbeck Gerhard, Franz Wolfgang-M
Medical Clinic I-Department of Cardiology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 17;48(8):1712-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.044. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
The purpose of this investigator-driven, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase II study was to compare the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the improvement of myocardial function in patients undergoing delayed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Experimental and early clinical studies suggest that transplantation of stem cells improves cardiac regeneration and neovascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Most investigators have utilized either a direct injection or intracoronary infusion of bone marrow-derived cells, but early cytokine-mediated mobilization of stem cells has been reported to show similar improvement in cardiac function.
Forty-four patients with late revascularized subacute STEMI were treated either with G-CSF or placebo over 5 days after successful PCI. Primary end points were change of global and regional myocardial function from baseline (1 week after PCI) to 3 months after PCI assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondary end points consisted of characterization of mobilized stem cell populations, assessment of safety parameters up to 12 months including 6-month angiography, as well as myocardial perfusion assessed by MRI.
Global myocardial function from baseline (1 week after PCI) to 3 months improved in both groups, but G-CSF was not superior to placebo (Delta(ejection fraction) 6.2 +/- 9.0 vs. 5.3 +/- 9.8%, p = 0.77). A slight but non-significant improvement of regional function occurred in both groups. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor resulted in mobilization of endothelial progenitor cell populations and was well tolerated with a similar rate of target lesion revascularization from in-stent restenosis. In both groups major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in a comparable frequency. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor resulted in significant improvement of myocardial perfusion 1 week and 1 month after PCI.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment after PCI in subacute STEMI is feasible and relatively safe. However, patients do not benefit from G-CSF when PCI is performed late. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor results in improved myocardial perfusion of the infarcted area, which may reflect enhanced neovascularization.
本项研究者发起的前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照II期研究旨在比较粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)对接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者心肌功能改善的影响。
实验和早期临床研究表明,干细胞移植可改善急性心肌梗死后的心脏再生和新生血管形成。大多数研究者采用直接注射或冠状动脉内输注骨髓来源的细胞,但据报道,早期细胞因子介导的干细胞动员在心脏功能改善方面表现相似。
44例亚急性STEMI晚期血运重建患者在PCI成功后5天内接受G-CSF或安慰剂治疗。主要终点是通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估从基线(PCI后1周)到PCI后3个月的整体和局部心肌功能变化。次要终点包括动员的干细胞群体特征、长达12个月的安全性参数评估(包括6个月血管造影)以及通过MRI评估的心肌灌注。
两组从基线(PCI后1周)到3个月的整体心肌功能均有改善,但G-CSF并不优于安慰剂(射血分数变化6.2±9.0%对5.3±9.8%,p = 0.77)。两组局部功能均有轻微但无统计学意义的改善。粒细胞集落刺激因子导致内皮祖细胞群体动员,耐受性良好,支架内再狭窄导致的靶病变血运重建率相似。两组主要不良心血管事件发生率相当。粒细胞集落刺激因子导致PCI后1周和1个月心肌灌注显著改善。
亚急性STEMI患者PCI后使用粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗是可行且相对安全的。然而,晚期进行PCI时患者无法从G-CSF中获益。粒细胞集落刺激因子可改善梗死区域的心肌灌注,这可能反映了新生血管形成增强。