MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Leukemia. 2012 May;26(5):934-42. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.326. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
We investigated ten-eleven translocation 2 (TET2) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), their correlation with other gene mutations and prognostic value. By deep-sequencing, 131 somatic TET2 mutations were identified in 87/318 (27.4%) patients. Of 87 mutated cases, 44 (50.6%) carried two mutations. TET2 mutations were concomitantly observed with mutations in NPM1, FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, JAK2, RUNX1, CEBPA, CBL and KRAS. However, TET2 mutations rarely concomitantly occurred with IDH1mut or IDH2mut (2/251 or 0/184; P=0.046 and P=0.003, respectively). TET2 mutations were associated with normal karyotype AML (CN-AML) (62/206 (30.1%) CN-AML vs 20/107 (18.7%) aberrant karyotype; P=0.031), higher white blood cell count (mean 65.3 vs 40.3 × 10(9)/l, P=0.023), lower platelet count (mean 68.6 vs 92.4 × 10(9)/l, P=0.03) and higher age (67.5 vs 65.2 years, P<0.001). Survival analyses were restricted to de novo CN-AML patients (n=165) and showed inferior event-free survival (EFS) of TET2 mutations compared with TET2wt (median: 6.7 vs 18.7 months, P=0.009). This negative effect of TET2 mutation on EFS was particularly observed in patients 65 years (median: 8.9 months vs not reached (n.r.), P=0.027) as well as in patients of the European LeukemiaNet favorable-risk subgroup, that is, patients harboring mutated CEBPA and/or mutated NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (median: 10.3 vs 41.3 months, P=0.048). These data support a role for TET2 as an important prognostic biomarker in AML.
我们研究了十一个转位 2 号(TET2)在急性髓性白血病(AML)中的突变,及其与其他基因突变的相关性和预后价值。通过深度测序,在 318 例患者中的 87 例(27.4%)中鉴定出 131 个体细胞 TET2 突变。在 87 例突变病例中,44 例(50.6%)携带两种突变。TET2 突变与 NPM1、FLT3-ITD、FLT3-TKD、JAK2、RUNX1、CEBPA、CBL 和 KRAS 的突变同时发生。然而,TET2 突变很少与 IDH1mut 或 IDH2mut 同时发生(2/251 或 0/184;P=0.046 和 P=0.003)。TET2 突变与正常核型 AML(CN-AML)相关(62/206(30.1%)CN-AML 与 20/107(18.7%)异常核型;P=0.031),白细胞计数较高(平均 65.3 vs 40.3×10(9)/l,P=0.023),血小板计数较低(平均 68.6 vs 92.4×10(9)/l,P=0.03),年龄较大(67.5 vs 65.2 岁,P<0.001)。生存分析仅限于初发 CN-AML 患者(n=165),结果显示 TET2 突变患者的无事件生存(EFS)较 TET2wt 患者差(中位:6.7 与 18.7 个月,P=0.009)。TET2 突变对 EFS 的负性影响在 65 岁以上患者中尤为明显(中位:8.9 个月与未达到(n.r.),P=0.027),以及在欧洲白血病网有利风险亚组患者中,即携带突变 CEBPA 和/或突变 NPM1 而无 FLT3-ITD 的患者(中位:10.3 与 41.3 个月,P=0.048)。这些数据支持 TET2 作为 AML 中一个重要的预后生物标志物的作用。