Hamza N, Marath A, Al-Fakhry M R
Rashid Military Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1990 Jul-Aug;31(4):457-61.
Between 1986-1988, 600 vascular cases arising from the Iran-Iraq conflict were dealt with within an 18 month period and 60 cases of popliteal artery and/or venous disruption were encountered presenting at variable times after injury. A policy of management between the forward and base hospital surgical teams was introduced, observing the following broad categorizations: (a) assessment/referral, (b) assessment/fasciotomy/referral, (c) immediate operation/referral for further operation/review/management. Two types of incision were used to enter the popliteal fossa: (a) a medial incision and (b) a sigmoid posterior incision (which we now favor). The results of this strategy of management and operative technique (when compared with our previous experience within the same time frame) suggested an improved outcome. Fifty-four out of 60 cases had a satisfactory operative result with below-knee amputation being required in only four cases and higher amputations in two others. No operative or postoperative deaths occurred. The implementation of this "vetting policy" at the front line appeared to reduce the number of amputations and assisted the clarification of management criteria in assessing limb viability at the forward hospital when a large number of casualties were being received. Operative access using the sigmoid posterior incision was not associated with any complications, offered better exposure than the medial incision and was technically easier for the surgeon to perform.
1986年至1988年间,在18个月内处理了600例因两伊冲突导致的血管病例,其中遇到60例腘动脉和/或静脉断裂病例,这些病例在受伤后的不同时间就诊。制定了前线和后方医院手术团队之间的管理策略,遵循以下大致分类:(a)评估/转诊;(b)评估/筋膜切开术/转诊;(c)立即手术/转诊进行进一步手术/复查/管理。采用两种切口进入腘窝:(a)内侧切口;(b)乙状后切口(我们现在更倾向于这种切口)。与我们在同一时间框架内的先前经验相比,这种管理策略和手术技术的结果表明预后有所改善。60例病例中有54例手术结果令人满意,仅4例需要进行膝下截肢,另外2例需要更高位的截肢。无手术或术后死亡病例。在前线实施这种“审查政策”似乎减少了截肢数量,并有助于在接收大量伤员时,在前线医院明确评估肢体生存能力的管理标准。采用乙状后切口进行手术入路未出现任何并发症,比内侧切口提供了更好的暴露,并且对外科医生来说技术上更容易操作。