Deftereos Spyridon, Giannopoulos Georgios, Kossyvakis Charalambos, Raisakis Konstantinos, Panagopoulou Vasiliki, Kaoukis Andreas, Doudoumis Konstantinos, Pyrgakis Vlasios, Stefanadis Christodoulos
Department of Cardiology, Athens General Hospital G. Gennimatas, 154 Mesogeion Ave., 11527, Athens, Greece.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug;34(2):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9635-4. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
Placement of an electrode catheter in the coronary sinus (CS) through the jugular or subclavian vein, as part of electrophysiology (EP) procedures, increases patient discomfort and the possibility of adverse events. We studied the hypothesis that peripheral venous access for CS cannulation, as part of EP procedures, is feasible and can reduce patient discomfort, eliminating central venous access-associated risks.
Consecutive patients submitted to EP procedures were randomly assigned to peripheral or central venous access for CS cannulation. If after 30 min from initial needle insertion the CS was still not catheterized, the attempt was considered unsuccessful. Patient level of discomfort was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS).
Success rate was 90% in the peripheral versus 95% in the central venous access group (p = 1.00). No complications related to venous access were observed in the peripheral venous access group, whereas one case of pneumothorax and one case of extensive hematoma in the anterior cervical area were recorded in the central venous access group. Patients submitted to central vein catheterization reported higher VAS scores, 46.8 ± 16.3 versus 36.8 ± 12.9 (p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed in fluoroscopy time needed for CS cannulation (51.1 ± 9.2 s versus 51.4 ± 7.9 s; p = 0.71) between the two groups.
This small, randomized study indicates that peripheral venous access for CS catheter placement during EP procedures is feasible, with equivalent success rate to the central venous access approach, and associated with lower levels of self-reported patient discomfort.
在电生理(EP)手术中,通过颈静脉或锁骨下静脉将电极导管置入冠状窦(CS)会增加患者的不适感以及发生不良事件的可能性。我们研究了以下假设:作为EP手术的一部分,经外周静脉途径进行CS插管是可行的,并且可以减轻患者的不适感,消除与中心静脉通路相关的风险。
连续接受EP手术的患者被随机分配至经外周静脉或中心静脉途径进行CS插管。如果在首次进针后30分钟仍未成功插入CS导管,则该尝试被视为失败。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者的不适程度。
外周静脉通路组的成功率为90%,而中心静脉通路组为95%(p = 1.00)。外周静脉通路组未观察到与静脉通路相关的并发症,而中心静脉通路组记录到1例气胸和1例颈前部广泛血肿。接受中心静脉插管的患者报告的VAS评分更高,分别为46.8±16.3和36.8±12.9(p = 0.04)。两组之间CS插管所需的透视时间无显著差异(51.1±9.2秒对51.4±7.9秒;p = 0.71)。
这项小型随机研究表明,在EP手术期间经外周静脉途径进行CS导管置入是可行的,成功率与中心静脉通路途径相当,且患者自我报告的不适程度较低。