Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
World Neurosurg. 2013 Mar-Apr;79(3-4):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.019. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
There are few reports on the effect of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for brain metastases from colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors for local control, complications, and survival in our series of patients treated with GKS.
Eighty patients (36 males, 44 females) with 140 metastases who received GKS between 1996 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean tumor volume was 6.13 (0.01-35.5) cm(3); the prescription dose was 21.1 (10-25.1) Gy and the maximum dose 42.7 (17.2-66.7) Gy; and the tumor cover was 95.0% (72%-100%).
Growth control was achieved in 93 of 121 tumors (76.9%) and 42 of 68 (61.8%) patients, while treatment failure was seen in 28 of 121 tumors (23.1%). Local control was better if a high prescription dose of 25 Gy was used, 88.4% vs. 71.4% (P = 0.017), or if tumor volume was <5 cm(3) (86.4%), compared with 69.9% for 5-20 cm(3) and 51.9% for >20 cm(3) (P = 0.002). The hazard ratio for local failure with lower prescription doses was 2.8 (P = 0.026) in the unadjusted, and 8.5 (P = 0.055) in the adjusted multivariate analysis (tumor volumes >5 cm(3)). The median survival was 6 months (range 0-75) after GKS. Age <70 years (P < 0.001) and high RPA class (P = 0.032) were associated with longer survival. Fifteen patients (22.1%) had persistent edema on follow-up MRI, possibly because of radiation damage to the tumor. Radiation-induced edema was asymptomatic in 93.8%. We found neither a decrease in the incidence of new metastases nor improved survival when whole-brain radiation therapy was given prior to GKS.
GKS provides reasonable local tumor control. Local control rate is highest if the margin dose is 25 Gy and the tumor volume <5 cm(3). Radiation edema was common but rarely symptomatic. Survival is longest for young, well-functioning patients.
关于结直肠癌脑转移行伽玛刀手术(GKS)的疗效鲜有报道。本研究旨在确定我们系列患者接受 GKS 治疗后的局部控制、并发症和生存的预后因素。
回顾性分析 1996 年至 2008 年间接受 GKS 治疗的 80 例(36 例男性,44 例女性)140 个转移灶患者。平均肿瘤体积为 6.13(0.01-35.5)cm3;处方剂量为 21.1(10-25.1)Gy,最大剂量为 42.7(17.2-66.7)Gy;肿瘤覆盖 95.0%(72%-100%)。
121 个肿瘤中有 93 个(76.9%)和 68 个患者中的 42 个(61.8%)达到肿瘤生长控制,而 121 个肿瘤中有 28 个(23.1%)出现治疗失败。如果使用 25 Gy 的高处方剂量,局部控制率为 88.4%,优于 71.4%(P=0.017);或者肿瘤体积<5 cm3(86.4%),与 5-20 cm3(69.9%)和>20 cm3(51.9%)相比,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。未调整和调整多变量分析(肿瘤体积>5 cm3)中,局部失败的危险比为 2.8(P=0.026)和 8.5(P=0.055)。GKS 后中位生存期为 6 个月(0-75 个月)。年龄<70 岁(P<0.001)和高 RPA 分级(P=0.032)与生存期延长相关。15 例(22.1%)患者在随访 MRI 上存在持续的水肿,可能是由于肿瘤的放射损伤。93.8%的放射性水肿无症状。我们发现,在 GKS 之前给予全脑放疗既不能降低新转移灶的发生率,也不能提高生存率。
GKS 可提供合理的局部肿瘤控制。如果边缘剂量为 25 Gy,肿瘤体积<5 cm3,则局部控制率最高。放射性水肿很常见,但很少有症状。对于年轻、功能良好的患者,生存时间最长。