Stevenson John C
National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, UK.
Menopause Int. 2011 Dec;17(4):137-41. doi: 10.1258/mi.2011.011112. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
For many years, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was the mainstay for osteoporosis prevention in postmenopausal women until a large randomized clinical trial raised serious safety concerns. This resulted in a big drop in HRT use and its demotion by regulatory authorities to second-line treatment. Many clinicians now feel that HRT is not safe to use, and recommend various alternatives for the treatment of osteoporosis. But how effective are these alternative therapies, are they any safer than HRT, and how do their costs compare? This review questions the validity of the safety concerns about HRT, and highlights the safety concerns about alternative therapies. It concludes that HRT is as safe as the other treatment options, and its efficacy and low cost demand that it be restored as a first-line treatment for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Other therapies are available for use in osteoporosis, and the bisphosphonates are particularly effective for the treatment of the established disease. However, they must be used selectively and with caution, and are best restricted to those patients who are elderly or have severe disease. New treatments are emerging, but again caution must be taken until any long-term adverse effects have been identified.
多年来,激素替代疗法(HRT)一直是绝经后女性预防骨质疏松症的主要手段,直到一项大型随机临床试验引发了严重的安全担忧。这导致HRT的使用大幅下降,监管机构将其降级为二线治疗。现在许多临床医生认为HRT使用不安全,并推荐各种替代疗法来治疗骨质疏松症。但这些替代疗法的效果如何,它们是否比HRT更安全,成本又如何比较呢?本综述对HRT安全担忧的合理性提出质疑,并强调了替代疗法的安全问题。结论是HRT与其他治疗选择一样安全,其疗效和低成本要求将其恢复为预防绝经后骨质疏松症的一线治疗方法。其他疗法也可用于治疗骨质疏松症,双膦酸盐对已确诊的疾病特别有效。然而,必须谨慎选择使用,最好仅限于老年患者或患有严重疾病的患者。新的治疗方法不断涌现,但在确定任何长期不良反应之前,同样必须谨慎使用。