The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):817-24. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.200317. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab + methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
269 Japanese patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX were randomised (1:1:1) to placebo + MTX (Group 1), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (Group 2) or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (Group 3). Subcutaneous golimumab/placebo was injected every 4 weeks; stable doses of oral MTX (6-8 mg/week) were continued. Patients were allowed to enter early escape (Group 1 added golimumab 50 mg, Group 2 increased golimumab to 100 mg, Group 3 continued golimumab 100 mg) based on swollen/tender joint counts at week 14. The primary study endpoint was achievement of at least 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response criteria at week 14. To control for multiplicity of testing, treatment group comparisons were first made between combined Groups 2 and 3 versus Group 1, followed by comparisons of Group 2 and Group 3 versus Group 1.
The proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at week 14 was significantly higher in combined Groups 2 and 3 (73.4%, 127/173) and in each of Group 2 (72.1%, 62/86) and Group 3 (74.7%, 65/87) compared with Group 1 (27.3%, 24/88; p<0.0001 for all comparisons). Golimumab + MTX also elicited a significantly better response than placebo + MTX in other efficacy parameters, including disease activity score (DAS28) response/remission and radiographic assessments. During the 16-week fixed treatment regimen study period, 72.7%, 75.6% and 78.2% of patients had adverse events and 1.1%, 1.2% and 2.3% had serious adverse events in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
In Japanese patients with active RA despite MTX therapy, golimumab + MTX was significantly more effective than MTX monotherapy in reducing RA signs/symptoms and limiting radiographic progression with no unexpected safety concerns.
评估戈利木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)在日本活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效和安全性。
269 例 MTX 治疗后仍处于活动期的日本 RA 患者,按 1:1:1 比例随机分为安慰剂+MTX(第 1 组)、戈利木单抗 50mg+MTX(第 2 组)和戈利木单抗 100mg+MTX(第 3 组)。每 4 周皮下注射戈利木单抗/安慰剂;继续给予稳定剂量的口服 MTX(6-8mg/周)。根据第 14 周时肿胀/压痛关节计数,允许第 1 组(加用戈利木单抗 50mg)、第 2 组(增加戈利木单抗至 100mg)和第 3 组(继续戈利木单抗 100mg)提前进入早期逃逸。主要研究终点为第 14 周时达到美国风湿病学会(ACR)20%改善标准的患者比例。为了控制多重检验,首先比较联合组 2 和 3 与组 1,然后比较组 2 和组 3 与组 1。
联合组 2 和 3(73.4%,127/173)和组 2(72.1%,62/86)和组 3(74.7%,65/87)的患者在第 14 周时 ACR20 应答比例显著高于组 1(27.3%,24/88;所有比较均<0.0001)。戈利木单抗联合 MTX 也比安慰剂联合 MTX 在其他疗效参数方面产生了更好的应答,包括疾病活动评分(DAS28)应答/缓解和影像学评估。在 16 周固定治疗期间,组 1、2 和 3 中分别有 72.7%、75.6%和 78.2%的患者出现不良事件,分别有 1.1%、1.2%和 2.3%的患者出现严重不良事件。
在 MTX 治疗后仍处于活动期的日本 RA 患者中,与 MTX 单药治疗相比,戈利木单抗联合 MTX 可显著降低 RA 体征/症状,限制影像学进展,且无意外安全性问题。