van den Beukel Tessa O, Verduijn Marion, le Cessie Saskia, Jager Kitty J, Boeschoten Elisabeth W, Krediet Raymond T, Siegert Carl E H, Honig Adriaan, Dekker Friedo W
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jun;27(6):2472-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr631. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
Ethnic minority patients on dialysis are reported to have better survival rates relative to Caucasians. The reasons for this finding are not fully understood and European studies are scarce. This study examined whether ethnic differences in survival could be explained by patient characteristics, including psychosocial factors.
We analysed data of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis study, an observational prospective cohort study of patients who started dialysis between 1997 and 2007 in the Netherlands. Ethnicity was classified as Caucasian, Black or Asian, assessed by local nurses. Data collected at the start of dialysis treatment included demographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics. Psychosocial characteristics included data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health status and general health perception. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to explore ethnic survival differences.
One thousand seven hundred and ninety-one patients were Caucasian, 45 Black and 108 Asian. The ethnic groups differed significantly in age, residual glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, erythropoietin use, plasma calcium, parathormone and creatinine, marital status and general health perception. No ethnic differences were found in HRQoL and mental health status. Crude hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality for Caucasians compared to Blacks and Asians were 3.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-5.9] and 1.1 (95% CI 0.9-1.5), respectively. After adjustment for a range of potential explanatory variables, including psychosocial factors, the HRs were 2.5 (95% CI 1.2-4.9) compared with Blacks and 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.6) compared with Asians.
Although patient numbers were rather small, this study demonstrates, with 95% confidence, better survival for Black compared to Caucasian dialysis patients and equal survival for Asian compared to Caucasian dialysis patients in the Netherlands. This could not be explained by patient characteristics, including psychosocial factors.
据报道,接受透析治疗的少数民族患者的生存率高于白种人。这一发现的原因尚未完全明确,且欧洲的相关研究较少。本研究旨在探讨生存方面的种族差异是否可以通过患者特征(包括社会心理因素)来解释。
我们分析了荷兰透析充分性合作研究的数据,这是一项对1997年至2007年期间在荷兰开始透析治疗的患者进行的前瞻性观察队列研究。种族被分为白种人、黑人或亚洲人,由当地护士进行评估。在透析治疗开始时收集的数据包括人口统计学、临床和社会心理特征。社会心理特征包括与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)、心理健康状况和总体健康认知的数据。采用Cox比例风险分析来探讨种族生存差异。
1791名患者为白种人,45名患者为黑人,108名患者为亚洲人。不同种族在年龄、残余肾小球滤过率、糖尿病、促红细胞生成素的使用、血浆钙、甲状旁腺激素和肌酐、婚姻状况以及总体健康认知方面存在显著差异。在HRQoL和心理健康状况方面未发现种族差异。与黑人及亚洲人相比,白种人死亡的粗风险比(HR)分别为3.1[95%置信区间(CI)1.6 - 5.9]和1.1(95%CI 0.9 - 1.5)。在对一系列潜在解释变量(包括社会心理因素)进行调整后,与黑人相比的HR为2.5(95%CI 1.2 - 4.9),与亚洲人相比的HR为1.2(95%CI 0.9 - 1.6)。
尽管患者数量相对较少,但本研究以95%的置信度表明,在荷兰,黑人透析患者的生存率高于白种人,亚洲透析患者与白种人患者的生存率相当。这无法通过包括社会心理因素在内的患者特征来解释。