Miller M B, Chapman L J, Chapman J P, Barnett E M
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1990 Aug;99(3):313-6. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.99.3.313.
We investigated two hypotheses about the span of apprehension task in schizophrenia: (a) schizophrenics show performance deficit on the forced-choice (FC) version but not on the full-report (FR) version, and (b) schizophrenic impairment on the FC version is greater when the display subtends a wide visual angle than when it subtends a narrow one. Schizophrenic (n = 21) and normal (n = 22) groups were tested on 3 versions of the task. A narrow-angle FC version was matched psychometrically with a wide-angle one by use of a greater number of noise letters in the narrow version. Schizophrenics reported fewer correct letters than normals on the FR version but did not differ on either the wide or the narrow FC versions. The results imply that schizophrenic deficit is not specific to the FC version and that on the FC version, visual angle is not more important than number of noise letters for demonstrating schizophrenic deficit.
(a)精神分裂症患者在强制选择(FC)版本任务中表现出缺陷,但在全报告(FR)版本任务中没有;(b)当刺激呈现的视角较宽时,精神分裂症患者在FC版本任务中的损伤比视角较窄时更大。对精神分裂症患者组(n = 21)和正常组(n = 22)进行了该任务3个版本的测试。通过在窄视角版本中使用更多的干扰字母,使窄视角FC版本在心理测量上与宽视角版本相匹配。在FR版本任务中,精神分裂症患者报告的正确字母比正常人少,但在宽视角或窄视角FC版本任务中没有差异。结果表明,精神分裂症患者的缺陷并非FC版本所特有,并且在FC版本任务中,对于显示精神分裂症患者的缺陷而言,视角并不比干扰字母的数量更重要。