• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences.

作者信息

McFadden D, Wright B A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Aug;88(2):711-24. doi: 10.1121/1.399774.

DOI:10.1121/1.399774
PMID:2212295
Abstract

Comodulation detection differences (CDDs) were studied using flanking bands that were either gated simultaneously with the signal band (burst) or gated at varying times prior to signal onset (fringed). Used for these experiments were a signal band centered at 1250 Hz and four flanking bands centered at 450, 850, 1650, and 2050 Hz; all bands were 100 Hz wide. In different conditions, the temporal envelope of the signal band was either the same as (correlated), or different from (uncorrelated), the common envelope of the four flanking bands, or the temporal envelopes of all of the bands were different (all-uncorrelated). For 8 of the 13 listeners, signal detectability improved by as much as 25 dB as the temporal fringe of the flanking bands was increased from 5 to about 700 ms. This temporal decline of masking was similar, but not identical, for the correlated, uncorrelated, and all-uncorrelated conditions. Results of this sort are reminiscent of several related findings that have been attributed to auditory adaptation or enhancement, or to a temporally developing critical-band filter. The other 5 of the 13 listeners were generally more sensitive than the majority, and they showed little or no improvement in detectability as fringe duration was varied. Large individual differences of this sort are not uncommon in the adaptation and comodulation literatures. As signal duration was changed from 50 to 240 ms, temporal integration was less in the correlated condition than in the uncorrelated condition, thereby producing a larger CDD with the longer signal. When the fringe followed the observation interval instead of preceding it, the results were equivocal because detectability improved for the majority of subjects and worsened for the minority. In follow-up experiments, different subsets of these four flanking bands were used. When temporal gaps of varying duration were inserted into the flanking band(s) immediately prior to the observation intervals, it was found that a temporal gap as long as 355 ms was not sufficient to reset the mechanisms underlying the temporal decline of masking.

摘要

相似文献

1
Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Aug;88(2):711-24. doi: 10.1121/1.399774.
2
Temporal decline of masking and comodulation masking release.掩蔽及共调制掩蔽释放的时间性衰退
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jul;92(1):144-56. doi: 10.1121/1.404279.
3
Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers.作为中心频率掩蔽音与边带掩蔽音之间带宽和时间延迟函数的共调制掩蔽释放。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Aug;88(2):725-31. doi: 10.1121/1.399775.
4
Uncertainty about the correlation among temporal envelopes in two comodulation tasks.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Sep;88(3):1339-50. doi: 10.1121/1.399711.
5
Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jul;88(1):119-25. doi: 10.1121/1.399957.
6
Comodulation masking release in a forward-masking paradigm.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Nov;82(5):1615-20. doi: 10.1121/1.395152.
7
Profile analysis and comodulation detection differences using narrow bands of noise and their relation to comodulation masking release.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Apr;95(4):2180-91. doi: 10.1121/1.408678.
8
Comodulation masking release as a function of level.作为声级函数的共调制掩蔽释放。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Aug;90(2 Pt 1):829-35. doi: 10.1121/1.401950.
9
Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers.固定频率和移动频率掩蔽器的共调制检测差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Feb;119(2):1021-8. doi: 10.1121/1.2151788.
10
Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.共调制掩蔽释放(CMR):信号频率、边带频率、掩蔽带宽、边带电平以及边带单耳与双耳呈现的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Dec;82(6):1944-56. doi: 10.1121/1.395639.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of temporal coherence and temporal predictability in the build-up of auditory grouping.在听觉分组形成过程中,时间连贯性和时间可预测性的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 25;12(1):14493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18583-0.
2
Age-Related Differences in Early Cortical Representations of Target Speech Masked by Either Steady-State Noise or Competing Speech.由稳态噪声或竞争语音掩盖的目标语音早期皮层表征中的年龄相关差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:935475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935475. eCollection 2022.
3
Comodulation Enhances Signal Detection via Priming of Auditory Cortical Circuits.
共调制通过听觉皮层回路的启动增强信号检测。
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 7;36(49):12299-12311. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0656-16.2016.
4
Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.听觉增强对掩蔽声和目标成分响度的影响。
Hear Res. 2016 Mar;333:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
5
Detection of modulated tones in modulated noise by non-human primates.非人灵长类动物对调制噪声中调制音调的检测
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Oct;15(5):801-21. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0467-7. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
6
The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response.听觉增强效应在80赫兹听觉稳态反应中未得到体现。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Aug;15(4):621-30. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0455-y. Epub 2014 May 21.
7
Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.听觉增强频谱幅度增量源自不止一个来源。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct;13(5):693-702. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0339-y. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
8
Sequential effects on the detectability of a tone added to a multitone masker.对添加到多音掩蔽器中的纯音可检测性的顺序效应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):EL20-6. doi: 10.1121/1.3040027.
9
Comodulation detection differences in children and adults.儿童与成人共调制检测差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Apr;123(4):2213-9. doi: 10.1121/1.2839006.
10
Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers.固定频率和移动频率掩蔽器的共调制检测差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Feb;119(2):1021-8. doi: 10.1121/1.2151788.