Suppr超能文献

立体定向核心活检:11 号与 8 号真空辅助乳腺活检的比较。

Stereotactic core biopsy: Comparison of 11 gauge with 8 gauge vacuum assisted breast biopsy.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Oct;81(10):2613-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.027. Epub 2011 Nov 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The compare the performance and ability to obtain a correct diagnosis on needle biopsy between 11 gauge and 8 gauge vacuum assisted biopsy devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital records of all consecutive stereotactic core biopsies performed over five years were retrospectively reviewed in compliance Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) policy and with approval from the hospital institutional review board (IRB). Pathology from core biopsy was compared with surgical pathology and/or imaging follow-up. A histological underestimation was defined if the surgical excision yielded a higher grade on pathology which changed management.

RESULTS

828 needle core biopsies (47.5%, 393/828 with 11 gauge and 52.5%, 435/828 with 8 gauge) yielded 471 benign, 153 high risk and 204 malignant lesions. 30/193 (15.5%) 11 gauge lesions and 16/185 (8.6%) 8 gauge lesions demonstrated higher grade pathology on surgical excision. The difference in the rates of the number of correct diagnoses on core needle biopsy between 11 gauge (363/393, 92.4%) and 8 gauge (419/435, 96.3%) based on either surgical or clinical/imaging follow up and the difference in the number of discordant benign core biopsies between 11 (17/217, 7.8%) and 8 gauge (4/254, 1.6%) necessitating a surgical biopsy was significant (P=0.013; P=0.001). Although there were more underestimations with the 11 gauge (25/193, 13.0%) than 8 gauge (15/185, 8.1%) needle, this was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates improved performance and increased diagnostic ability of 8 gauge needle over 11 gauge in obtaining a correct diagnosis on needle biopsy.

摘要

目的

比较 11 号和 8 号真空辅助活检装置在针吸活检中的性能和获得正确诊断的能力。

材料与方法

根据《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPPA)的规定,并经医院机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,对五年来所有连续进行的立体定向核心活检的医院记录进行了回顾性审查。将核心活检的病理学与手术病理学和/或影像学随访进行比较。如果手术切除的组织学分级更高,改变了治疗方案,则定义为组织学低估。

结果

828 例针芯活检(47.5%,393/828 例使用 11 号针,52.5%,435/828 例使用 8 号针)中,471 例为良性病变,153 例为高危病变,204 例为恶性病变。30/193(15.5%)例 11 号针病变和 16/185(8.6%)例 8 号针病变在手术切除时显示出更高的组织学分级。根据手术或临床/影像学随访,11 号针(363/393,92.4%)和 8 号针(419/435,96.3%)活检的正确诊断率之间的差异,以及 11 号针(17/217,7.8%)和 8 号针(4/254,1.6%)之间需要手术活检的良性核心活检的差异均有统计学意义(P=0.013;P=0.001)。虽然 11 号针(25/193,13.0%)的低估率高于 8 号针(15/185,8.1%),但差异无统计学意义。

结论

我们的研究表明,在获得正确的针吸活检诊断方面,8 号针的性能优于 11 号针,诊断能力也有所提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验