Carrière N, Kreisler A, Dujardin K, Destée A, Defebvre L
Université Lille-Nord-de-France, 1 bis, rue Georges-Lefèvre, 59000 Lille, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2012 Feb;168(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
Impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are associated with dopamine agonist treatment. Although discontinuation of dopamine agonist is recommended, ICD management has not been precisely stated. The aims of the study were to describe demographic and clinical characteristics in a group of PD patients with ICDs and to evaluate the management of dopamine agonist treatment proposed to the same patients in order to treat the ICDs.
Thirty-five PD patients with ICD and 607 PD patients without ICD were studied. In the ICD group, demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively (ICD characteristics, motor and cognitive evaluation); demographic and clinical data were obtained retrospectively in the group without ICD.
In the ICD group, the sex ratio was 2.9 (versus 1.2 in the absence of ICD; p<0.05), the mean age was 57.5 years (versus 66.9 years; p<0.01) and the mean age at PD onset was 48.3 years (versus 55.5 years; p<0.01). All ICD patients were receiving a dopamine agonist when the ICD started (versus 50.9 % of patients receiving a dopamine agonist in the absence of ICD; p<10(-6)). In mean, ICDs started 2.8 years before they were diagnosed. No particular dopamine agonist was associated with ICDs more frequently than the others. Discontinuation of the dopamine agonist was the treatment the more frequently associated with the recovery of ICDs (93.3 %). Dose lowering and the change of dopamine agonist resulted in complete regression of ICDs respectively in 9.1% and 33.3% of patients.
Young age, male gender and young age at PD onset are frequent in PD patients developing ICDs, as already described in American or Asian cohorts. We highlighted a long diagnosis delay and confirmed the strong efficacy of dopamine agonist withdrawal.
帕金森病(PD)中的冲动控制障碍(ICD)与多巴胺激动剂治疗相关。尽管建议停用多巴胺激动剂,但ICD的管理尚未有确切阐述。本研究的目的是描述一组患有ICD的PD患者的人口统计学和临床特征,并评估针对同一组患者为治疗ICD而提出的多巴胺激动剂治疗管理方案。
对35例患有ICD的PD患者和607例未患ICD的PD患者进行研究。在ICD组中,前瞻性收集人口统计学和临床数据(ICD特征、运动和认知评估);在无ICD组中回顾性获取人口统计学和临床数据。
在ICD组中,性别比为2.9(无ICD组为1.2;p<0.05),平均年龄为57.5岁(无ICD组为66.9岁;p<0.01),PD发病的平均年龄为48.3岁(无ICD组为55.5岁;p<0.01)。所有ICD患者在ICD开始时均在接受多巴胺激动剂治疗(无ICD患者中接受多巴胺激动剂治疗的比例为50.9%;p<10(-6))。平均而言,ICD在被诊断出之前2.8年开始出现。没有哪种特定的多巴胺激动剂比其他激动剂更常与ICD相关。停用多巴胺激动剂是与ICD恢复最常相关的治疗方法(93.3%)。降低剂量和更换多巴胺激动剂分别使9.1%和33.3%的患者的ICD完全消退。
正如在美国或亚洲队列中所描述的那样,患ICD的PD患者中常见年轻、男性以及PD发病年龄较轻的情况。我们强调了诊断延迟时间长,并证实了停用多巴胺激动剂的强效疗效。