• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

典型肿瘤部位被动散射和强度调制质子治疗的计划比较。

A treatment planning comparison of passive-scattering and intensity-modulated proton therapy for typical tumor sites.

机构信息

Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2012;53(2):272-80. doi: 10.1269/jrr.11136. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1269/jrr.11136
PMID:22129564
Abstract

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is expected to improve treatment results with fewer side effects than other proton therapies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tumor sites for which IMPT was effective under the same beam calculation conditions by planning IMPT for typical cases treated with passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT). We selected 16 cases of nasal cavity, lung, liver or prostate cancers as typical tumor sites receiving PSPT. The dose distributions and dose volume histograms optimized by the IMPT were compared with those optimized by the PSPT. We took particular note of the doses to the skin and organs at risk (OAR) when PSPT was replaced by IMPT. Furthermore, an improvement of the beam angles was also performed to obtain better dose distributions in the IMPT. The IMPT with the same beam angles resulted in near-maximum doses to the skin of average 78%, 64%, 84% and 99% of the PSPT doses for nasal cavity, lung, liver, and prostate cancers, respectively. However, it was difficult to improve the dose homogeneity of the target volume. The change of the IMPT beam angles could reduce the doses to OARs and skin in the case of the nasal cavity, while it had limited effect in the other cases. We concluded that IMPT was effective for reducing the doses to some OARs when treating nasal cavity, lung, liver and prostate cancers. The selection of beam angles was important in the IMPT optimization, especially for nasal cavity cancers.

摘要

调强质子治疗(IMPT)有望在减少副作用的情况下提高治疗效果,优于其他质子治疗。本研究旨在通过为接受被动散射质子治疗(PSPT)的典型病例规划 IMPT,评估在相同射束计算条件下 IMPT 有效的肿瘤部位。我们选择了 16 例鼻腔、肺、肝或前列腺癌作为接受 PSPT 治疗的典型肿瘤部位。比较了由 IMPT 优化的剂量分布和剂量体积直方图与由 PSPT 优化的剂量分布和剂量体积直方图。当 PSPT 被 IMPT 取代时,我们特别注意皮肤和危及器官(OAR)的剂量。此外,还进行了射束角度的改进,以在 IMPT 中获得更好的剂量分布。使用相同射束角度的 IMPT 导致鼻腔、肺、肝和前列腺癌的皮肤平均达到 78%、64%、84%和 99%的最大剂量,分别为 PSPT 剂量的近最大值。然而,很难改善靶区的剂量均匀性。改变 IMPT 射束角度可以减少鼻腔病例中 OAR 和皮肤的剂量,但在其他病例中效果有限。我们得出结论,在治疗鼻腔、肺、肝和前列腺癌时,IMPT 可有效降低某些 OAR 的剂量。在 IMPT 优化中,射束角度的选择很重要,特别是对于鼻腔癌。

相似文献

1
A treatment planning comparison of passive-scattering and intensity-modulated proton therapy for typical tumor sites.典型肿瘤部位被动散射和强度调制质子治疗的计划比较。
J Radiat Res. 2012;53(2):272-80. doi: 10.1269/jrr.11136. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
2
A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas.脊柱旁肉瘤的调强光子放疗与质子治疗的治疗计划比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1596-606. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.028.
3
Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies.联合调强放疗(IMRT)和质子治疗与单纯 IMRT 用于妇科恶性肿瘤盆腔和腹主动脉旁放疗的剂量学比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
4
Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies.调强质子治疗在胸部恶性肿瘤中的临床应用
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15;90(4):809-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.045. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
5
Intensity-modulated proton therapy reduces the dose to normal tissue compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or passive scattering proton therapy and enables individualized radical radiotherapy for extensive stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: a virtual clinical study.调强质子治疗与调强放射治疗或被动散射质子治疗相比,可降低正常组织剂量,并为广泛期 IIIB 期非小细胞肺癌提供个体化根治性放射治疗:一项虚拟临床研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jun 1;77(2):357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.028. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
6
Proton beam radiotherapy versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: A comparative study.质子束放疗与分割立体定向放疗治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的比较研究
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):373-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.01.057.
7
Intensity modulated proton therapy for craniospinal irradiation: organ-at-risk exposure and a low-gradient junctioning technique.用于全脑全脊髓照射的调强质子治疗:危及器官暴露及低梯度衔接技术
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 1;90(3):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
8
Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.前列腺病例的调强质子治疗(IMPT)、容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)和4π放疗的治疗计划比较
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0761-0.
9
Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.网格大小对XiO脑癌治疗计划系统中均匀扫描和调强质子治疗计划的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):447–456. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5510.
10
Comparison of passive-scattered and intensity-modulated proton beam therapy of craniospinal irradiation with proton beams for pediatric and young adult patients with brain tumors.颅脊髓照射中被动散射和强度调制质子束治疗与质子束治疗儿童和青年脑肿瘤患者的比较。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Feb;42(2):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01499-8. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Salivary Gland Carcinoma: High Local Control and Quality of Life Preservation.调强质子治疗涎腺癌的临床结果:高局部控制率及生活质量保留
Head Neck. 2025 Aug;47(8):2313-2323. doi: 10.1002/hed.28149. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Investigation of factors related to treatment planning of x-ray SBRT and scanning carbon-ion radiation therapy for early-stage lung cancer patients.早期肺癌患者X射线立体定向体部放疗和扫描碳离子放射治疗的治疗计划相关因素研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Apr;26(4):e14618. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14618. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3
On the Way to Accounting for Lung Modulation Effects in Particle Therapy of Lung Cancer Patients-A Review.
肺癌患者粒子治疗中肺部调制效应的考量之路——综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 25;16(21):3598. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213598.
4
Impact of Rectal Spacer on Toxicity Reduction in Men Treated With Proton Versus Photon Therapy.直肠间隔器对接受质子治疗与光子治疗的男性患者降低毒性的影响。
Int J Part Ther. 2024 Jun 20;13:100111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100111. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Patient-specific quality assurance of dynamically-collimated proton therapy treatment plans.动态适形质子治疗计划的个体化质量保证。
Med Phys. 2024 Sep;51(9):5901-5910. doi: 10.1002/mp.17295. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
6
Proton Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Review of Potential Approaches for Patient Selection.质子治疗在乳腺癌中的应用:患者选择的潜在方法综述。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241234788. doi: 10.1177/15330338241234788.
7
Optimal Bladder Volume for Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Each Localized Prostate Cancer Risk Group.各局限性前列腺癌风险组中质子分割放疗的最佳膀胱容积
Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11):e48723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48723. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Investigating aperture-based approximations to model a focused dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.研究孔径近似方法,建立用于笔形束扫描质子治疗的聚焦动态准直系统模型。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022 Feb 18;8(2). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac525f.
9
Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: Passive Scattering versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy.局限性前列腺癌的超分割质子治疗:被动散射与调强质子治疗
J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):1311. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121311.
10
Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors.鼻窦恶性肿瘤的点扫描质子治疗
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Jun 25;8(1):189-199. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00043.1. eCollection 2021 Summer.