Division of Cardiology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Dec;26 Suppl 1:S31-7. doi: 10.1097/01.hco.0000409965.20588.c5.
This review is aimed at describing the variability in response to P2Y12 inhibitor agents, and to focus on the main tests currently available to assess the responsiveness.
There is high interindividual response variability to clopidogrel. Some patients do not respond to the drug; this condition can be due to patient-related factors (poor compliance, genetic factors, cardiovascular risk profile) or to drug-related factors (reduced bioavailability or absorption, drug-drug interactions). In particular, mutations of the gene encoding for cytochrome CYP2C19, responsible for clopidogrel metabolism, are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Many tools for assessing platelet function are now available, but an appropriate test able to correlate platelet function to patient clinical outcome is still far from being recognized. There is also no standardized method to address their role in clinical practice. In addition, the safety and efficacy of alternative treatments for patients with 'clopidogrel resistance' has not been demonstrated yet. The recent findings from the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow Assay-Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) study showed that increasing the dose of clopidogrel in patients who are resistant does not decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events. Therefore, until the results of large-scale trials of personalized antiplatelet therapy are available, the routine use of platelet function measurements in the care of patients with cardiovascular disease cannot be recommended.
Clopidogrel resistance is associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Despite several available tools to test clopidogrel responsiveness, there is no uniform definition of 'non-responder' patients. The reduction of platelet reactivity in non-responder patients is not associated with reduced cardiovascular events. Current evidence suggests that higher antiplatelet regimens provide clinical benefits to the patient's risk profile rather than his/her 'platelet profile'.
本综述旨在描述对 P2Y12 抑制剂反应的变异性,并重点介绍目前可用于评估反应性的主要检测方法。
氯吡格雷的个体间反应差异很大。有些患者对药物没有反应;这种情况可能是由于患者相关因素(依从性差、遗传因素、心血管风险状况)或药物相关因素(生物利用度或吸收降低、药物相互作用)所致。特别是,编码细胞色素 CYP2C19 的基因发生突变,该基因负责氯吡格雷的代谢,与心血管事件风险增加相关。目前有许多评估血小板功能的工具,但仍远未确定能够将血小板功能与患者临床结局相关联的适当检测方法。此外,这些检测方法在临床实践中的作用也没有标准化的方法。此外,对于“氯吡格雷抵抗”患者,替代治疗的安全性和有效性尚未得到证实。最近的 Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow Assay-Impact on Thrombosis and Safety(GRAVITAS)研究结果表明,增加氯吡格雷抵抗患者的剂量并不能降低心血管事件的发生率。因此,在个体化抗血小板治疗的大规模试验结果出来之前,不能推荐常规使用血小板功能检测来治疗心血管疾病患者。
氯吡格雷抵抗与心血管事件发生率增加相关。尽管有几种检测氯吡格雷反应性的方法,但目前还没有统一的“无反应”患者定义。无反应患者的血小板反应性降低与心血管事件减少无关。目前的证据表明,更高的抗血小板治疗方案为患者的风险状况而非其“血小板状况”提供了临床获益。