Yamada J, Imai H, Ikebe Y
Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
J Gen Psychol. 1990 Jul;117(3):311-23.
A lexical decision task was used to investigate the dual-route hypothesis that, in reading words conventionally written in katakana, a Japanese syllabic script, lexical access may be achieved by both a process of assembled segmental phonology and the use of a visual orthographic lexicon. The variables examined were lexicality (words and nonwords), kana type (katakana and hiragana), string length (long and short), and vocal interference (silence and concurrent vocalization). The main effects of the first three variables were significant, but more important, we found that subjects could be divided into two groups--phonological assemblers and orthographic lexicon users. Words that assume sighting were also identified. Collectively, the results were interpreted to uphold the dual-route hypothesis and to reject the common view that kana words are accessed on the basis of phonological mediation alone.
一项词汇判断任务被用于研究双通路假说,即在阅读用片假名(一种日语音节文字)常规书写的单词时,词汇通达可能通过组合音段音系学过程和使用视觉正字法词典这两种方式来实现。所考察的变量有词汇性(单词和非单词)、假名类型(片假名和平假名)、字符串长度(长和短)以及语音干扰(安静和同时发声)。前三个变量的主效应显著,但更重要的是,我们发现受试者可分为两组——音系组合者和正字法词典使用者。还识别出了假定为视读的单词。总体而言,这些结果被解释为支持双通路假说,并拒绝了那种认为假名单词仅基于语音中介来通达的普遍观点。