Ernest Paul, Hill Warren, Potvin Richard
TLC Eyecare & Laser Centers, 1116 W. Ganson, Jackson, MI 49202, USA.
J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:243170. doi: 10.1155/2011/243170. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
Purpose. To compare the surgically induced astigmatism from clear corneal and square posterior limbal incisions at the time of cataract surgery. Methods. Surgically induced astigmatism was calculated for a set of eyes after cataract surgery using a temporal 2.2 mm square posterior limbal incision. Results were compared to similar available data from surgeons using clear corneal incisions of similar size. Results. Preoperative corneal astigmatism averaged 1.0 D and was not significantly different between the incision types. Surgically induced astigmatism with the 2.2 mm posterior limbal incision averaged 0.25 ± 0.14 D, significantly lower in magnitude than the aggregate surgically induced astigmatism produced by the 2.2 mm clear corneal incision (0.68 ± 0.49 D). Conclusion. The 2.2 mm square posterior limbal incision induced significantly less, and significantly less variable, surgically induced astigmatism relative to a similar-sized clear corneal incision. This is likely to improve refractive outcomes, particularly important with regard to premium intraocular lenses.
目的。比较白内障手术时透明角膜切口和方形后角膜缘切口所引起的手术性散光。方法。对一组白内障手术后的眼睛,采用颞侧2.2毫米方形后角膜缘切口计算手术性散光。将结果与使用类似大小透明角膜切口的外科医生的现有类似数据进行比较。结果。术前角膜散光平均为1.0 D,两种切口类型之间无显著差异。2.2毫米后角膜缘切口引起的手术性散光平均为0.25±0.14 D,其程度明显低于2.2毫米透明角膜切口所产生的总手术性散光(0.68±0.49 D)。结论。相对于类似大小的透明角膜切口,2.2毫米方形后角膜缘切口引起的手术性散光明显更少,且变异性明显更小。这可能会改善屈光效果,对于高端人工晶状体而言尤为重要。