Seacrist Thomas, Saffioti Jami, Balasubramanian Sriram, Kadlowec Jennifer, Sterner Robert, García-España J Felipe, Arbogast Kristy B, Maltese Matthew R
Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 May;27(4):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
Previous studies reported passive cervical range of motion under unknown loading conditions or with minimal detail of subject positioning. Additionally, such studies have not quantitatively ensured the absence of active muscle during passive measurements. For the purpose of validating biomechanical models the loading condition, initial position, and muscle activation must be clearly defined. A method is needed to quantify the passive range of motion properties of the cervical spine under controlled loading conditions, particularly in the pediatric population where normative clinical and model validation data is limited.
Healthy female pediatric (6-12years; n=10), male pediatric (6-12years; n=9), female adult (21-40years; n=10), and male adult (20-36years; n=9) volunteers were enrolled. Subjects with restrained torsos and lower extremities were exposed to a maximum 1g inertial load in the posterior-anterior direction, such that the head-neck complex flexed when subjects relaxed their neck musculature. Surface electromyography monitored the level of muscle relaxation. A multi-camera 3-D target tracking system captured passive neck flexion angle of the head relative to the thoracic spine. General estimating equations detected statistical differences across age and gender.
Passive cervical spine flexion equaled 111.0° (SD 8.0°) for pediatric females, 102.8° (SD 7.8°) for adult females, 103.8° (SD 12.7°) for pediatric males, and 93.7° (SD 9.9°) for adult males. Passive neck flexion significantly decreased with age in both genders (P<0.01). Females exhibited significantly greater flexion than males (P<0.01).
This study contributes normative data for clinical use, biomechanical modeling, and injury prevention tool development.
以往的研究报告了在未知负荷条件下或受试者体位细节最少的情况下的被动颈椎活动范围。此外,此类研究并未在被动测量期间定量确保无主动肌肉活动。为了验证生物力学模型,必须明确负荷条件、初始位置和肌肉激活情况。需要一种方法来量化在受控负荷条件下颈椎的被动活动范围特性,特别是在儿科人群中,因为该人群的规范临床和模型验证数据有限。
招募了健康的儿科女性(6 - 12岁;n = 10)、儿科男性(6 - 12岁;n = 9)、成年女性(21 - 40岁;n = 10)和成年男性(20 - 36岁;n = 9)志愿者。躯干和下肢受限的受试者在前后方向上承受最大1g的惯性负荷,使得当受试者放松颈部肌肉时头颈部复合体屈曲。表面肌电图监测肌肉放松程度。多摄像头三维目标跟踪系统捕捉头部相对于胸椎的被动颈部屈曲角度。通用估计方程检测年龄和性别之间的统计差异。
儿科女性的被动颈椎屈曲角度为111.0°(标准差8.0°),成年女性为102.8°(标准差7.8°),儿科男性为103.8°(标准差12.7°),成年男性为93.7°(标准差9.9°)。被动颈部屈曲在两性中均随年龄显著降低(P<0.01)。女性的屈曲角度显著大于男性(P<0.01)。
本研究为临床应用、生物力学建模和损伤预防工具开发提供了规范数据。