Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):e273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.025.
Miniscrews can be used to provide absolute anchorage during orthodontic treatment. If we could obtain the optimum design or shape of the miniscrew, we might be able to reduce its size and lessen the chance of root contact. In addition, miniscrews are placed at several angles, and orthodontic forces are applied in various directions for clinical requirements. In this study, we used finite element analysis to investigate changes in stress distribution at the supporting bone and miniscrew by changing the angle and the shape of the miniscrew and the direction of force.
Three types of miniscrews (cylindrical pin, helical thread, and nonhelical thread) were designed and placed in 2 types of supporting bone (cancellous and cortical). The miniscrews were inclined at 30°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 90° to the surface of the supporting bone. A force of 2N was applied in 3 directions.
Significantly lower maximum stress was observed in the cancellous bone compared with the cortical bone. By changing the implantation angle, the ranges of the maximum stress distribution at the supporting bone were 9.46 to 14.8 MPa in the pin type, and 17.8 to 75.2 MPa in the helical thread type. On the other hand, the ranges of the maximum stress distribution at the titanium element were 26.8 to 92.8 MPa in the pin type, and 121 to 382 MPa in the helical thread type. According to the migration length of the threads in the nonhelical type, the maximum stresses were 19.9 to 113 MPa at the bone, and 151 to 313 MPa at the titanium element. By changing the angle of rotation in the helical thread type, the maximum stress distributions were 25.4 to 125 MPa at the bone, and 149 to 426 MPa at the titanium element. Furthermore, the maximum stress varied at each angle according to the direction of the applied load.
From our results, the maximum stresses observed in all analyzed types and shapes of miniscrews were under the yield stress of pure titanium and cortical bone. This indicates that the miniscrews in this study have enough strength to resist most orthodontic loads.
微型种植钉可在正畸治疗中提供绝对支抗。如果我们能获得微型种植钉的最佳设计或形状,我们或许能够减小其尺寸并减少与牙根接触的机会。此外,微型种植钉以多种角度放置,为满足临床需求,正畸力以多种方向施加。在这项研究中,我们使用有限元分析,通过改变微型种植钉的角度和形状以及力的方向,研究支撑骨和微型种植钉的应力分布变化。
设计了 3 种类型的微型种植钉(圆柱销、螺旋螺纹和无螺纹),并将其放置在 2 种支撑骨(松质骨和皮质骨)中。微型种植钉与支撑骨表面的倾斜角度分别为 30°、40°、45°、50°、60°、70°、80°和 90°。在 3 个方向施加 2N 的力。
与皮质骨相比,松质骨的最大应力明显更低。通过改变植入角度,在销型中,支撑骨的最大应力分布范围为 9.46 至 14.8MPa,在螺旋螺纹型中为 17.8 至 75.2MPa。另一方面,在销型中,钛元素的最大应力分布范围为 26.8 至 92.8MPa,在螺旋螺纹型中为 121 至 382MPa。根据无螺纹型中螺纹的迁移长度,在骨中最大应力为 19.9 至 113MPa,在钛元素中最大应力为 151 至 313MPa。通过改变螺旋螺纹型的旋转角度,在骨中的最大应力分布范围为 25.4 至 125MPa,在钛元素中的最大应力分布范围为 149 至 426MPa。此外,根据施加的负载方向,每个角度的最大应力都有所不同。
从我们的结果来看,所有分析的微型种植钉类型和形状观察到的最大应力均低于纯钛和皮质骨的屈服应力。这表明,本研究中的微型种植钉具有足够的强度来抵抗大多数正畸负荷。