Lilly Research Laboratories Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):476-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.045. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
No current data were available regarding the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in Japanese patients with bipolar I disorder with a current manic/mixed episode.
Patients received blindly olanzapine (5-20 mg/day; N=105), haloperidol (2.5-10 mg/day; N=20), or placebo (N=99) for 3 weeks. For the following 3 weeks, the olanzapine and haloperidol groups continued their treatment, while the placebo group switched blindly to olanzapine. The primary efficacy measure was the mean change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score; secondary efficacy measures included bipolar disorder remission rate and switch-to depression. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), weight and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs).
YMRS total score significantly decreased in the olanzapine group compared with the placebo group (-5.62 [95% CI: -8.87, -2.37], p<0.001) after 3 weeks. Compared with haloperidol, olanzapine was not markedly different in improving overall bipolar symptomatology, and fewer olanzapine-treated patients switched to symptomatic depression (2.4% vs 16.7%, p=0.014). Overall incidences of TEAEs were not significantly different among the groups, and EPSs in olanzapine group were less severe than in the haloperidol group.
The small haloperidol sample size limited the conclusions that can be drawn from the statistical comparisons between the active treatments.
This was the first study to evaluate an atypical antipsychotic in Japanese patients with manic bipolar I disorder. Consistent with previous non-Japanese studies, olanzapine was generally well-tolerated and superior to placebo in improving the severity of manic symptoms. Compared to haloperidol, fewer olanzapine-treated patients switched to symptomatic depression, and EPSs were less severe.
目前尚无奥氮平治疗伴有当前躁狂/混合发作的日本双相 I 型障碍患者的疗效和安全性数据。
患者接受为期 3 周的奥氮平(5-20mg/天;N=105)、氟哌啶醇(2.5-10mg/天;N=20)或安慰剂(N=99)盲法治疗。接下来的 3 周,奥氮平和氟哌啶醇组继续治疗,而安慰剂组则盲法换用奥氮平。主要疗效指标是 Young 躁狂评定量表(YMRS)总分的平均变化;次要疗效指标包括双相障碍缓解率和转为抑郁。安全性措施包括治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)、体重和锥体外系症状(EPSs)。
奥氮平组与安慰剂组相比,YMRS 总分在 3 周后显著下降(-5.62[95%CI:-8.87,-2.37],p<0.001)。与氟哌啶醇相比,奥氮平在改善整体双相症状方面并无明显差异,且接受奥氮平治疗的患者转为症状性抑郁的人数较少(2.4%比 16.7%,p=0.014)。各组间总的不良事件发生率无显著差异,奥氮平组的 EPS 较氟哌啶醇组轻。
氟哌啶醇样本量小,限制了从活性治疗之间的统计学比较中得出结论。
这是第一项评估日本躁狂双相 I 型障碍患者使用非典型抗精神病药物的研究。与以前的非日本研究一致,奥氮平总体上耐受性良好,在改善躁狂症状严重程度方面优于安慰剂。与氟哌啶醇相比,接受奥氮平治疗的患者转为症状性抑郁的人数较少,且 EPS 较轻。