Benazzi Franco, Berk Michael, Frye Mark A, Wang Wei, Barraco Alessandra, Tohen Mauricio
Hecker Psychiatry Research Center, Forli, Italy.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;70(10):1424-31. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04772gre.
Mixed depression (ie, co-occurrence of syndromal depression and subsyndromal mania/hypomania) is a common variant of bipolar depression. However, its treatment is much understudied. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of the antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing agent olanzapine and the efficacy of the combination of an antidepressant (fluoxetine) and olanzapine (olanzapine/fluoxetine combination; OFC) for the treatment of bipolar I mixed depression.
We carried out a post hoc analysis of an 8-week, double-blind trial of adult bipolar I depression treated with placebo (n = 355), olanzapine (5-20 mg/d; n = 351), or OFC (olanzapine/fluoxetine doses: 6/25, 6/50, 12/50 mg/d; n = 82). Studying mixed depression was not a previous goal of the double-blind trial. Subjects in the trial were diagnosed according to DSM-IV and were randomly assigned to treatment during the period June 2000 to December 2001. Mixed depression was defined as the co-occurrence of a major depressive episode and > or = 2 manic/hypomanic symptoms (ie, > or = 2 Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] items scoring > or = 2). Response was defined as a > or = 50% reduction in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score and < 2 concurrent manic/hypomanic symptoms. Switching to mania/hypomania was defined as a YMRS score > or = 15.
Frequency of mixed depression was 45.1% in the OFC arm, 49.3% in the olanzapine arm, and 46.8% in the placebo arm (P = .705). The most frequent manic/ hypomanic symptoms of mixed depression were irritability, reduced need for sleep, talkativeness, and racing thoughts. Response rates in patients with nonmixed depression versus patients with mixed depression were the following: in the OFC arm, 48.9% versus 43.2% (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.51-2.98); in the olanzapine arm, 39.9% versus 26.6% (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.17-2.90); in the placebo arm, 27.5% versus 16.3% (OR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.15-3.28). Response rates in the samples of patients with mixed depression were the following: OFC versus olanzapine, OR = 2.00 (95% CI, 0.96-4.19); OFC versus placebo, OR = 3.91 (95% CI, 1.80-8.49); olanzapine versus placebo, OR = 1.95 (95% CI, 1.14-3.34). It was found that no baseline manic/hypomanic symptom of mixed depression predicted treatment response. A higher number of baseline concurrent manic/hypomanic symptoms predicted a lower response rate in the olanzapine and placebo arms, but not in the OFC arm. The rates of switching were the following: in the OFC arm, 8.5%; in the olanzapine arm, 6.8%; and in the placebo arm, 7.9% (P = .808). The rates of dropouts in patients with mixed depression versus patients with nonmixed depression were not significantly different within any of the treatment arms. The rates of dropouts in the samples of patients with mixed depression were the following: in the OFC arm, 29.7%; in the olanzapine arm, 53.8%; and in the placebo arm, 59.6% (olanzapine vs OFC: OR = 2.66; 95% CI, 1.23-5.75; placebo vs OFC: OR = 3.48; 95% CI, 1.61-7.54; placebo vs olanzapine: OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.84-2.01).
Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination may be an effective treatment for bipolar I mixed depression. Statistically, the efficacy of OFC was not significantly different from that of olanzapine, but inspection of the 95% CI showed a trend in favor of a possible superiority of OFC. Supporting the study findings are the similar efficacy of OFC in bipolar mixed depression independent of the number of concurrent manic/hypomanic symptoms, a lower dropout rate, and a similarly low switching rate compared to olanzapine. Contrary to other current limited evidence, an antidepressant (fluoxetine) showed efficacy and did not worsen bipolar mixed depression if combined with a mood-stabilizing agent (olanzapine).
混合性抑郁(即综合征性抑郁与亚综合征性躁狂/轻躁狂同时出现)是双相抑郁的一种常见类型。然而,其治疗方法的研究尚少。本研究旨在评估抗精神病药物及心境稳定剂奥氮平以及抗抑郁药(氟西汀)与奥氮平联合使用(奥氮平/氟西汀联合制剂;OFC)治疗双相I型混合性抑郁的疗效。
我们对一项为期8周的双盲试验进行了事后分析,该试验中成年双相I型抑郁患者分别接受安慰剂治疗(n = 355)、奥氮平治疗(5 - 20 mg/d;n = 351)或OFC治疗(奥氮平/氟西汀剂量:6/25、6/50、12/50 mg/d;n = 82)。研究混合性抑郁并非该双盲试验之前设定的目标。试验中的受试者依据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)进行诊断,并于2000年6月至2001年12月期间随机分配接受治疗。混合性抑郁定义为重度抑郁发作与≥2项躁狂/轻躁狂症状同时出现(即≥2项杨氏躁狂评定量表[YMRS]项目得分≥2)。缓解定义为蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表得分降低≥50%且同时存在的躁狂/轻躁狂症状<2项。转为躁狂/轻躁狂定义为YMRS得分≥15。
OFC组中混合性抑郁的发生率为45.1%,奥氮平组为49.3%,安慰剂组为46.8%(P = 0.705)。混合性抑郁最常见的躁狂/轻躁狂症状为易激惹、睡眠需求减少、健谈和思维奔逸。非混合性抑郁患者与混合性抑郁患者的缓解率如下:在OFC组中,分别为48.9%和43.2%(比值比[OR] = 1.24;95%置信区间[CI],0.51 - 2.98);在奥氮平组中,分别为39.9%和26.6%(OR = 1.84;95% CI,1.17 - 2.90);在安慰剂组中,分别为27.5%和16.3%(OR = 1.94;95% CI,1.15 - 3.28)。混合性抑郁患者样本中的缓解率如下:OFC组与奥氮平组相比,OR = 2.00(95% CI,0.96 - 4.19);OFC组与安慰剂组相比,OR = 3.91(95% CI,1.80 - 8.49);奥氮平组与安慰剂组相比,OR = 1.95(95% CI,1.14 - 3.34)。研究发现,混合性抑郁的基线躁狂/轻躁狂症状均不能预测治疗反应。基线时同时存在的躁狂/轻躁狂症状数量较多预示着奥氮平组和安慰剂组的缓解率较低,但在OFC组并非如此。转相率如下:OFC组为8.5%;奥氮平组为6.8%;安慰剂组为7.9%(P = 0.808)。在任何一个治疗组中,混合性抑郁患者与非混合性抑郁患者的脱落率均无显著差异。混合性抑郁患者样本中的脱落率如下:OFC组为29.7%;奥氮平组为53.8%;安慰剂组为59.6%(奥氮平组与OFC组相比:OR = 2.66;95% CI,1.23 - 5.75;安慰剂组与OFC组相比:OR = 3.48;95% CI,1.61 - 7.54;安慰剂组与奥氮平组相比:OR = 1.30;95% CI,0.84 - 2.01)。
奥氮平/氟西汀联合制剂可能是治疗双相I型混合性抑郁的有效方法。从统计学角度来看,OFC的疗效与奥氮平无显著差异,但对95%置信区间的检查显示出OFC可能具有优势的趋势。支持该研究结果的是,OFC在双相混合性抑郁中的疗效不受同时存在的躁狂/轻躁狂症状数量的影响,与奥氮平相比脱落率较低,转相率也同样较低。与目前其他有限的证据相反,抗抑郁药(氟西汀)与心境稳定剂(奥氮平)联合使用时显示出疗效且未加重双相混合性抑郁。