Institute of General Medicine, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 Mar;124(5-6):160-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-011-0061-5. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
BACKGROUND: The practice of inappropriate medication and drug prescription is a major risk factor for adverse drug reactions in geriatric patients and increases the individual, as well as overall, rates of hospital admissions, resulting in increased health care expenditures. A consensus-based list of drugs, generally to be avoided in geriatric patients, is a practical tool to possibly improve the quality of prescribing. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop a consensus-based list of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) for geriatric patients in Austria. Local market characteristics and documented prescribing regimens were considered in detail. METHODS: A two-round Delphi process involving eight experts in the field of geriatric medicine was undertaken to create a list of potentially inappropriate medications. Using a 5-point Likert scale (from strong agreement to strong disagreement), mean ratings from the experts were evaluated for each drug selected in the first round. The participants were first asked to comment on the potential inappropriateness of a preliminary list of drugs, and to propose alternate substances missing in the previous questionnaire for a second rating process. All drugs whose upper limit of the 95% CI was less than 3.0 were classified as potentially inappropriate. Drugs with a 95% CI enclosing 3.0 entered a second rating by the experts, in addition to other substances suggested during the first questionnaire. Drugs in the second rating were evaluated in comparable fashion to the first one. The final list was synthesized from the results in both rounds. RESULTS: Out of a preliminary list of 102 drugs, 61 drugs (59.2%) were classified as potentially inappropriate for geriatric persons in the first Delphi- round. In the second rating, six drugs that were reevaluated, and six drugs proposed additionally, were rated as potentially inappropriate. The final list contains 73 drugs to be avoided in older patients because of an unfavorable benefit/risk profile and/or unproven effectiveness. The list also contains suggestions for therapeutic alternatives and information about pharmacological and pharmacokinetic characteristics of all drugs judged as potentially inappropriate. CONCLUSION: The current Austrian list of potentially inappropriate medications may be a helpful tool for clinicians to increase the quality of prescribing in older patients. Like all explicit lists previously published, its validity needs to be proven in validation studies.
背景:不适当的药物使用和处方开具是老年患者发生药物不良反应的主要危险因素,会增加患者个人和总体的住院率,导致医疗保健支出增加。基于共识的、一般应避免在老年患者中使用的药物清单是提高处方质量的实用工具。
目的:旨在为奥地利老年患者制定基于共识的潜在不适当药物(PIM)清单。详细考虑了当地市场特征和已记录的处方方案。
方法:采用两轮德尔菲法,邀请 8 名老年医学领域的专家参与,以创建潜在不适当药物清单。专家们对第一轮中选择的每一种药物进行 5 分制(从非常同意到非常不同意)的平均评分。首先要求参与者对初步药物清单的潜在不适当性发表意见,并为前一轮问卷中缺失的替代物质提出建议进行第二轮评分。所有药物的上限 95%CI 小于 3.0 的均被归类为潜在不适当。95%CI 包含 3.0 的药物进入第二轮专家评分,同时还包括第一轮问卷中提出的其他物质。第二轮评分中的药物与第一轮评估方式相同。两轮结果综合得出最终清单。
结果:在初步的 102 种药物清单中,第一轮德尔菲法中有 61 种(59.2%)药物被归类为老年患者潜在不适当。在第二轮评估中,重新评估了 6 种药物,并额外提出了 6 种药物,被评定为潜在不适当。最终清单包含 73 种药物,由于获益/风险比不佳和/或有效性未经证实,应避免在老年患者中使用。清单还包含治疗替代药物的建议以及所有被评定为潜在不适当药物的药理学和药代动力学特征信息。
结论:目前奥地利的潜在不适当药物清单可能是临床医生提高老年患者处方质量的有用工具。与之前发表的所有明确清单一样,其有效性需要在验证研究中得到证明。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011-12-2
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010-8-9
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007-8
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018-12
JAMA Netw Open. 2024-6-3
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022-10-8
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2022-4
Arch Intern Med. 2010-12-13
Circulation. 2010-10-18
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010-9-24
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010-8-9
Drugs Aging. 2010-3-1