Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Ave, Room 158, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Vet Pathol. 2012 Jan;49(1):32-43. doi: 10.1177/0300985811429314. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
Inbred laboratory mouse strains are highly divergent in their immune response patterns as a result of genetic mutations and polymorphisms. The generation of genetically engineered mice (GEM) has, in the past, used embryonic stem (ES) cells for gene targeting from various 129 substrains followed by backcrossing into more fecund mouse strains. Although common inbred mice are considered "immune competent," many have variations in their immune system-some of which have been described-that may affect the phenotype. Recognition of these immune variations among commonly used inbred mouse strains is essential for the accurate interpretation of expected phenotypes or those that may arise unexpectedly. In GEM developed to study specific components of the immune system, accurate evaluation of immune responses must take into consideration not only the gene of interest but also how the background strain and microbial milieu contribute to the manifestation of findings in these mice. This article discusses points to consider regarding immunological differences between the common inbred laboratory mouse strains, particularly in their use as background strains in GEM.
由于遗传突变和多态性,近交系实验鼠在免疫反应模式上存在高度差异。过去,通过基因靶向从各种 129 亚系中使用胚胎干细胞(ES 细胞)产生基因工程鼠(GEM),然后将其回交到更具繁殖力的鼠系中。虽然常用的近交系鼠被认为具有“免疫能力”,但它们的免疫系统存在许多变异,其中一些已经被描述,这些变异可能会影响表型。识别这些常用近交系鼠之间的免疫差异对于准确解释预期表型或可能意外出现的表型至关重要。在为研究免疫系统特定成分而开发的 GEM 中,准确评估免疫反应不仅必须考虑到感兴趣的基因,还必须考虑到背景品系和微生物环境如何影响这些小鼠中发现的表现。本文讨论了在常见的近交系实验鼠之间的免疫差异方面需要考虑的要点,特别是在将其用作 GEM 的背景品系时。