Suppr超能文献

优化海绵组织的保存和储存时间,以获得用于下一代测序的高质量 mRNA。

Optimization of preservation and storage time of sponge tissues to obtain quality mRNA for next-generation sequencing.

机构信息

Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 Mar;12(2):312-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03097.x. Epub 2011 Dec 4.

Abstract

Transcriptome sequencing with next-generation sequencing technologies has the potential for addressing many long-standing questions about the biology of sponges. Transcriptome sequence quality depends on good cDNA libraries, which requires high-quality mRNA. Standard protocols for preserving and isolating mRNA often require optimization for unusual tissue types. Our aim was assessing the efficiency of two preservation modes, (i) flash freezing with liquid nitrogen (LN₂) and (ii) immersion in RNAlater, for the recovery of high-quality mRNA from sponge tissues. We also tested whether the long-term storage of samples at -80 °C affects the quantity and quality of mRNA. We extracted mRNA from nine sponge species and analysed the quantity and quality (A260/230 and A260/280 ratios) of mRNA according to preservation method, storage time, and taxonomy. The quantity and quality of mRNA depended significantly on the preservation method used (LN₂) outperforming RNAlater), the sponge species, and the interaction between them. When the preservation was analysed in combination with either storage time or species, the quantity and A260/230 ratio were both significantly higher for LN₂-preserved samples. Interestingly, individual comparisons for each preservation method over time indicated that both methods performed equally efficiently during the first month, but RNAlater lost efficiency in storage times longer than 2 months compared with flash-frozen samples. In summary, we find that for long-term preservation of samples, flash freezing is the preferred method. If LN₂ is not available, RNAlater can be used, but mRNA extraction during the first month of storage is advised.

摘要

利用下一代测序技术进行转录组测序有可能解决海绵生物学中的许多长期存在的问题。转录组序列质量取决于高质量的 cDNA 文库,这需要高质量的 mRNA。用于保存和分离 mRNA 的标准方案通常需要针对不常见的组织类型进行优化。我们的目的是评估两种保存模式(i)用液氮(LN₂)快速冷冻和(ii)浸入 RNAlater 对于从海绵组织中回收高质量 mRNA 的效率。我们还测试了将样品长期储存在-80°C 下是否会影响 mRNA 的数量和质量。我们从 9 种海绵物种中提取了 mRNA,并根据保存方法、储存时间和分类学分析了 mRNA 的数量和质量(A260/230 和 A260/280 比值)。mRNA 的数量和质量取决于所使用的保存方法(LN₂优于 RNAlater)、海绵物种以及它们之间的相互作用。当将保存方法与储存时间或物种结合进行分析时,LN₂保存的样品的数量和 A260/230 比值均显著更高。有趣的是,对于每种保存方法的个体比较随着时间的推移表明,这两种方法在第一个月都同样有效,但与冷冻保存的样品相比,RNAlater 在储存时间超过 2 个月后效率降低。总之,我们发现对于样品的长期保存,快速冷冻是首选方法。如果没有 LN₂,也可以使用 RNAlater,但建议在储存的第一个月内进行 mRNA 提取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验