• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk prediction in medicine and surgery: ethical and practical considerations.医学与外科领域的风险预测:伦理与实际考量
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1990 Jul;24(3):173-7.
2
Ethical dilemmas of neonatal--perinatal surgery.新生儿-围产期手术的伦理困境
Clin Perinatol. 1989 Mar;16(1):275-302.
3
The limits of viability: ethical considerations.生存能力的限度:伦理考量
Semin Perinatol. 1987 Jul;11(3):257-61.
4
Setting boundaries for artificial feeding.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Dec;14(6):8-10.
5
Ethics in nephrology: a regional approach.肾脏病学中的伦理学:一种区域性方法。
ANNA J. 1986 Dec;13(6):320-1, 329.
6
Withdrawing and withholding life support in geriatric surgical patients. Ethical considerations.老年外科患者生命支持的撤除与 withhold。伦理考量。 注:这里“withhold”常见释义为“拒绝给予;扣留”等,结合语境可能是指不给予某些生命支持措施,但准确意思还需结合更完整文本确定。
Surg Clin North Am. 1994 Apr;74(2):245-59.
7
Informed consent--ethical considerations.知情同意——伦理考量
Med Law. 1983;2(1):19-25.
8
Science, ethics, and the making of clinical decisions. Implications for risk factor intervention.科学、伦理与临床决策的制定。对风险因素干预的启示。
JAMA. 1988 Jun 3;259(21):3161-7.
9
Ethical considerations in phase I clinical trials.
Onkologie. 1990 Apr;13(2):85-8. doi: 10.1159/000216732.
10
Patenting medical and surgical techniques: an ethical-legal analysis.医学与外科技术的专利申请:伦理法律分析
J Med Philos. 1998 Feb;23(1):75-97. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.1.75.2590.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioprinting Technology in Skin, Heart, Pancreas and Cartilage Tissues: Progress and Challenges in Clinical Practice.皮肤、心脏、胰腺和软骨组织中的生物打印技术:临床实践中的进展与挑战
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 14;18(20):10806. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010806.
2
How should we manage symptomatic aortic stenosis in the patient who is 80 or older?对于80岁及以上的有症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者,我们应如何进行治疗?
Br Heart J. 1995 Nov;74(5):481-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.5.481.
3
Transient ischaemic attacks: which patients are at high (and low) risk of serious vascular events?短暂性脑缺血发作:哪些患者发生严重血管事件的风险高(或低)?
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;55(8):640-52. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.8.640.

本文引用的文献

1
Monitor-guided responses. Operability with safety is increased in patients with peripheral vascular diseases.监测引导下的反应。外周血管疾病患者的安全性操作能力得到提高。
Arch Surg. 1980 Nov;115(11):1384-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380110116018.
2
Prophylaxis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis: selective use of low-dose heparin in high-risk patients.术后深静脉血栓形成的预防:高危患者中低剂量肝素的选择性使用。
Br Med J. 1980 Aug 2;281(6236):345-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6236.345.
3
Postoperative deep vein thrombosis: identifying high-risk patients.术后深静脉血栓形成:识别高危患者。
Br Med J. 1980 Aug 2;281(6236):343-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6236.343.
4
Monitoring operative risk in the elderly.监测老年人的手术风险。
JAMA. 1980 Apr 4;243(13):1350-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.243.13.1350.
5
Post-operative complications in the elderly surgical patient.老年外科患者的术后并发症
Gerontology. 1983;29(4):262-70. doi: 10.1159/000213125.
6
Ethical issues in risk factor intervention.风险因素干预中的伦理问题。
Am J Med. 1984 Apr;76(4):557-61. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90272-9.
7
Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.医学期刊投稿人统计指南。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 7;286(6376):1489-93. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1489.
8
Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective?对提交给《英国医学杂志》的论文进行的统计评估有效吗?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 7;286(6376):1485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1485.
9
Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms.评估胃肠道症状的统计方法
Clin Gastroenterol. 1985 Jul;14(3):489-515.
10
Science, statistics, and deception.科学、统计学与欺骗。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):259-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-259.

医学与外科领域的风险预测:伦理与实际考量

Risk prediction in medicine and surgery: ethical and practical considerations.

作者信息

Seymour D G, Green M, Vaz F G, Coles E C

机构信息

University Department of Geriatric Medicine, Cardiff Royal Infirmary.

出版信息

J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1990 Jul;24(3):173-7.

PMID:2213671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5387650/
Abstract

Risk prediction is a subject of increasing clinical interest, and publications in this area are likely to have an important influence on patient care in the near future. A multiplicity of risk prediction systems, many of them computer-based, will raise a number of ethical and practical questions. These questions need to be addressed by the originators of systems, the editors of journals, practising clinicians, and the lay public.

摘要

风险预测是一个在临床上越来越受关注的主题,并且该领域的出版物在不久的将来可能会对患者护理产生重要影响。众多的风险预测系统,其中许多是基于计算机的,将会引发一系列伦理和实际问题。这些问题需要由系统开发者、期刊编辑、执业临床医生以及普通大众来解决。