Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2011 Dec;23(8):603-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.03.006.
To determine whether the first-attempt tracheal intubation incidence using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope is higher in patients with predicted increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy, and to assess the ability of other a priori defined standard risk factors to predict first-attempt intubation success, in aggregate and by forming scores.
Prospective study.
Operating room in a tertiary-care academic center.
357 patients intubated with the GlideScope for nonemergent general anesthesia.
Mallampati airway class was used to create two groups of patients, one with higher and the other, lower, potential difficult laryngoscopy (Mallampati classes 3-4 and 1-2, respectively). Intubation success on the first attempt with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope in patients with a Mallampati class 3 or 4 airway versus those with Mallampati class 1 or 2 airway was tested. We also evaluated the predictive ability of the Mallampati airway class (1 and 2 vs 3 and 4) along with 9 other possible predictors of difficult intubation on first-attempt intubation success: gender, age, body mass index, level of training within our anesthesia residency program (Clinical Anesthesia Resident years 1, 2, and 3), ASA physical status, mouth opening, thyromental distance, neck flexion, and neck extension.
None of the standard predictors of difficult intubation was significantly associated with outcome after adjusting for other predictors. A multivariable model containing the aggregate set of variables predicted outcome significantly better than a risk score formed as the sum of 10 predictors ("Risk 10"; P = 0.0176).
With GlideScope-assisted tracheal intubation, Mallampati airway class is not an independent risk factor for difficult intubation. Other standard clinical risk factors of difficulty with direct laryngoscopy also do not appear to be individually predictive of first-attempt success of tracheal intubation.
确定在预测喉镜检查困难风险增加的患者中,使用 GlideScope 视频喉镜进行首次气管插管的发生率是否更高,并评估其他预先定义的标准危险因素在总体上和通过形成评分来预测首次尝试插管成功的能力。
前瞻性研究。
三级保健学术中心的手术室。
357 例使用 GlideScope 进行非紧急全身麻醉的患者。
使用 Mallampati 气道分级来创建两组患者,一组具有较高的潜在喉镜检查困难(Mallampati 分级 3-4),另一组具有较低的潜在喉镜检查困难(Mallampati 分级 1-2)。测试 Mallampati 气道分级为 3 或 4 的患者与 Mallampati 气道分级为 1 或 2 的患者在 GlideScope 视频喉镜下首次尝试插管的成功率。我们还评估了 Mallampati 气道分级(1 和 2 与 3 和 4)以及 9 个其他可能预测首次尝试插管困难的因素(性别、年龄、体重指数、我们麻醉住院医师培训计划中的培训水平(临床麻醉住院医师 1、2 和 3 年)、ASA 身体状况、张口度、甲状软骨-下颌骨距离、颈部屈曲和颈部伸展)对首次尝试插管成功的预测能力。
在调整其他预测因素后,没有一个标准的插管困难预测因素与结果显著相关。包含所有变量的多变量模型比由 10 个预测因素组成的风险评分(“风险 10”)预测结果显著更好(P = 0.0176)。
在使用 GlideScope 辅助气管插管时,Mallampati 气道分级不是插管困难的独立危险因素。其他直接喉镜检查困难的标准临床危险因素也似乎不能单独预测首次尝试气管插管的成功。