Suppr超能文献

治疗师在提供饮食障碍认知行为疗法时,会报告使用哪些认知行为技术?

What cognitive behavioral techniques do therapists report using when delivering cognitive behavioral therapy for the eating disorders?

机构信息

Eating Disorders Section, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, England.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Feb;80(1):171-5. doi: 10.1037/a0026559. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians commonly "drift" away from using proven therapeutic techniques. This study examined the degree to which such drift occurs among cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) clinicians working with a specific clinical population-adults with eating disorders.

METHOD

The study used a correlational design. The participants were 80 qualified clinicians (69 women, 11 men; mean age = 39.2 years, range = 23-62 years) who routinely offered what they described as CBT to adults with eating disorders. Each clinician detailed whether and how often he or she used different cognitive behavioral techniques when delivering CBT to such patients, and each completed the anxiety scale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (Derogatis, 1983).

RESULTS

Implementation of specific CBT techniques was far lower than protocols would suggest, particularly for clinicians who were anxious, older, or more experienced in working with the eating disorders (p < .05, in all cases). The use of treatment manuals was associated with greater use of recommended CBT techniques (p < .05, in all cases). Cluster analysis showed that clinicians fell into three types-behavior, motivation, and mindfulness oriented.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings need to be extended to other therapies and other disorders, but they indicate the need for stronger training and closer supervision if clinicians are to give patients the best chance of recovery. They demonstrate that clinicians' use of the label CBT is not a reliable indicator of the therapy that is being offered.

摘要

目的

临床医生通常会偏离已证实的治疗技术。本研究考察了在治疗特定临床人群(患有饮食障碍的成年人)时,认知行为疗法(CBT)临床医生发生这种偏离的程度。

方法

本研究采用相关性设计。参与者为 80 名合格的临床医生(69 名女性,11 名男性;平均年龄为 39.2 岁,范围为 23-62 岁),他们通常向患有饮食障碍的成年人提供他们所谓的 CBT。每位临床医生详细描述了在向此类患者提供 CBT 时是否以及经常使用不同的认知行为技术,并且每位临床医生都完成了 Brief Symptom Inventory(Derogatis,1983)的焦虑量表。

结果

具体 CBT 技术的实施远低于方案建议,特别是对于焦虑、年龄较大或在治疗饮食障碍方面经验更丰富的临床医生(p<.05,所有情况下)。使用治疗手册与更频繁地使用推荐的 CBT 技术相关(p<.05,所有情况下)。聚类分析显示,临床医生分为行为、动机和正念导向三种类型。

结论

这些发现需要扩展到其他疗法和其他疾病,但它们表明,如果要让患者有最好的康复机会,就需要更强的培训和更密切的监督。它们表明,临床医生使用 CBT 标签并不是所提供治疗的可靠指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验